Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:G+ requires Picasa album permission changes (Score 2) 164

No, there were three privacy settings on the old picasa:

1. public and searchable
2. limited access - only those with the URL auth code can view (pass around the URL to your friends)
3. invite-only access - only specific google accounts can access.

The problem is that users of #3 could now re-share pictures they have access to. This breaks the invite-only capability.

-molo

Comment G+ requires Picasa album permission changes (Score 2) 164

When attempting to sign up for G+, I received a query about whether I wanted to join G+ and change my Picasa settings or leave them as is and not join. Here is what it said:

Linking Google+ with Picasa Web Albums
When you join Google+:
        [...]
        Your albums' visibility settings aren’t changed, but people they’re shared with can now share them with others.
        [...]

So invite-only albums would now allow re-sharing, which makes them no longer invite-only. This alone made me decide to not join G+.

-molo

Comment What about warrant-less wiretaps?? (Score 1) 149

This is less of a concern, this is the wiretaps requiring a warrant (meaning judicial oversight). The bigger concern is the warrantless wiretapping. All international calls, traffic analysis on all domestic calls, and who knows what else. It is safer to just asume everything is tapped. I can't count the number of times I've made a disparaging comment about the government on an international call (friends overseas) and added in a "Just kidding, NSA!" I'm ashamed of what this country has become.

-molo

Comment Bull (Score 1) 183

I walk on this street going to work, 47th between 5th and 6th. There is no way this guy is getting the equivalent of half an ounce of gold per week from the street. Its not like you look down and see flakes or anything. Insanity.

-molo

Comment Regulatory compliance (Score 1) 768

For those of us interested in developing financial services using bitcoin, how have you dealt with regulatory issues? It seems like the SEC and FINRA in the US would not be keen on unregistered broker-dealers and agents and owners not having the legally required Series 7 and Series 24 certifications. Have you sought the UK equivalent certifications? The requirements of lawyers, accountants, certifications etc. seem to put a very high capital cost on starting a legitimate business offering services in this space.

-molo

Comment NAT traversal in practice? (Score 2) 199

from the WebRTC FAQ:

Includes and abstracts key NAT and firewall traversal technology using STUN, ICE, TURN, RTP-over-TCP and support for proxies.

Does anyone know how well this works in practice? It seems that some external server will be needed for coordination, making this very much less P2P than it would otherwise be.

-molo

Comment Re:Passports? (Score 1) 349

Okay, you are correct on the MRZ. I thought those were mag printed characters like typically found on a US banking check, but apparently they are designed for OCR-reads, not magnetic reads. As for RFID, that is mostly semantics.. the important part is that it can be read over RF.

-molo

Slashdot Top Deals

System going down in 5 minutes.

Working...