Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Legal vs... (Score 1) 1078

Perhaps if you considered the impact of "third-hand" smoke, you'd see there actually is a problem. I think you'll agree that "second-hand" smoke is deposited on the computer, inside and out, by owners/operators who smoke. This residue -- a noxious mix of volatile organic compounds, many of which are proven carcinogens -- is re-heated when the device is powered up, as it routinely is during repair/maintenance. These VOCs are put back into the air -- and into the noses of the repair technicians -- where they can wreak havoc similar to 2nd-hand smoke. Does that make sense to you? It does to me.

In addition, there is the whole quality of life issue -- something that is VERY APPLE. As an ex-smoker, I can tell you smokers don't realize how bad they smell because their olfactory system is deadened by their habit. I wouldn't want a smoker's computer operating inside my house, and I sure as hell wouldn't stick my nose into it under any circumstances.

That said, Apple needs to stipulate that smoking voids the warranty up front. Applying the change ad hoc is hard to defend.

Comment Re:Not so fast.. (Score 1) 548

To a point, I agree with you. However, if we consider what led to Russia's sacrifices in WWII -- i.e., Adolph H. launched Operation Barbarossa in 1941, effectively turning Germany's former Axis partner into a de facto Western ally -- it's hard to feel too sorry for them. Then again considering how the War would have likely turned out otherwise, I deeply respect their sacrifice (and heartily applaud Hitler's stupidity).

Comment Re:It will be different this time (Score 1) 433

Sorry, as a long-time user of both OSs, Mac OS products are rock-solid in comparison to Windows counterparts. You may argue that that's because Apple also controls the hardware side of the equation . . . but that's the whole point to paying a bit extra for the seamless, solid and ultimately satisfying experience that is Apple.

Comment Re:Lowering of standards? (Score 1) 1721

Your grasp of the facts might be improved if you actually had opposable thumbs.

In terms of putting us in a financial hole, GWB takes the cake -- the one awarded by the Marie Antoinette Society for Smugly Stupid Ruling Class Twits. He and his cronies looted the US treasury like uncommon criminals, turning a surplus of billions of dollars into a deficit of trillions of dollars. Yes, President Obama has increased the deficit, but his actions were forced by the catastrophic destabilization of our national and world economies engineered by the Bush/Cheney cabal. And the healthcare fixes are driven by common decency.

It seems to me that if the Nobel committee wants to honor him for changing directions to prevent a global meltdown, rational people (and even so called Real Americans) would actually applaud rather than ridicule the award and its recipient.

Comment Re:Im waiting for the President to weigh in... (Score 1) 830

I don't think ridicule is the kind of attention they crave, nor from a marketing perspective, need. I do see, however, an 'art imitating life' scenario here: Taking Steve Jobs and Bill Gates to be symbolic as well as de facto embodiments of their respective firms, Apple ads are much like the former, Microsoft's, much like the latter. Merits of their products aside, I know which one I'd invite to a party.

Comment Re:Let's Not Get Ahead of Ourselves Here (Score 1) 705

Are you saying that this movie is as good/groundbreaking as Star Wars orThe Matrix? I am somewhat dubious. Don't get me wrong, it looks a whole lot better than most sci-fi movies. I especially like how the first commercials I saw for it were public service announcements about District 9. Then commercials with non-human sympathizers being arrested. Then later you see a commercial with "glick gluck mcglorlock" (translation: "We just want to go home.") and you kinda realize that there's going to be more depth to the story than Starship Troopers (the movie, not the book). Looks interesting, I'll definitely Netflix it. It might be the best sci-fi movie of '09 but you've still got

  • Gamer
  • The Fourth Kind
  • The Time Traveler's Wife
  • Pandorum
  • Splice
  • The Surrogates
  • 2012
  • 9
  • AstroBoy
  • The Box
  • The Sky Crawlers
  • Radio Free Albemuth
  • Hunter Prey
  • Deadland

While a lot don't have release dates yet and could be pushed back and most will probably suck, that's a lot of competition to dismiss at this point. And lastly, I have great hope for Franklyn (to be released here in the states).

You can probably scratch "The Time Traveler's Wife" and "2012" from your list. The first is being laughed out of theaters as we speak. The trailers for the second look like Michael Bay conceived of the "science."

Comment Re:Summary doesn't make it clear... (Score 1) 624

He is also extremely popular with his constituents, who fully support the way he operates his office. The US Justice Department now has him as a target (since the Obama Administration came to power) due to his enforcement of Immigration laws. In Arizona he polls 11 points higher than Obama so he is popular statewide.

Bear-baiting and slavery also were 'popular with constituents' in their times . . . that doesn't seem to have been a very good argument for keeping them around.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy." -- Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards

Working...