Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Even simple steps would improve their image (Score 1) 272

at&t and most other carriers are pretty much required to allow you to switch phone numbers. You have to complain about it though.

One thing you can do is if your phone allows it, you can assign unknown/blocked a ring tone, but make it ring silent (this varies from phone to phone, google is your friend, I did it on my Razr). Include something in your voicemail message that if they are calling from an unknown/blocked number, leave a message and you'll get back to them.

Comment Re:The pay step (Score 3, Funny) 133

the zune subscription tied with the zune software is incredibly easy and perfectly legal. $15 bucks a month and you get unlimited access to music that lasts as long as your subscription, you do, however, get to keep 10 songs a month that are included with the cost of the subscription. I use it for my listening needs because i don't need to hoard music forever, being able to play an album for a month or two and then delete it is precisely what I need in a service. Yes its drm, Yes its not my music, but i'm perfectly aware of that and I'm ok with it. I "rent" books from the library and "rent" movies from Netflix, why not music?

P.S. Its amazing how fast it is too, I mean you have microsoft hosting 2 million songs and only 6 people are using it. Songs download LIKE THAT! *snaps fingers*

Imagine how slow bittorrent would be if only 6 people used it...

Comment Re:Foundation, Not a Company (Score 4, Interesting) 156

The legal definition (as was explained to me by a drunk law school student) is that a company is a group of people working together towards a shared goal. I.E. a bunch of boy scouts who want to go camping could technically call themselves a company, a bunch of guys looking to go out drinking could technically be called a company. Scale that up and the foundation could be technically called a company.

Your issue isn't with the technical use of the word, but diction, its implied meaning and associations. That being said, the use is technically incorrect but not artistically apt.

Where the Hitchhiker's Guide is in error, it is definitively so. This means that Reality is the one who got things wrong. So when the publishers of the Hitchhiker's Guide got sued by the families of tourists who took literally the sentence 'Vicious Bugblatter beasts often make a good meal for visiting tourists' which should have been rendered 'Vicious Bugblatter beasts often make a good meal of visiting tourists', the publishers brought in a poet to testify under oath that the second sentence is the more aesthetically pleasing of the two, and that Beauty is Truth and Truth, Beauty. They argued then that Life itself was the culprit for being neither beautiful nor true. In a startling decision, the judges agreed, holding Life in contempt of court and confiscated it from everyone present before going out for a round of Ultra-golf.

Comment Re:Not needed (Score 1) 164

provided that the SSD is used only for hibernation data, the cost of the drive is more than the cost of the data, meaning that you can replace the drive for cost of drive + nada. If, however, you wish to rely on the drive for anything more than hibernation, you run into a case where the data is more valuable than the drive and additional measures should be taken to protect that data. Knowing most people though, they'll just curse and turn purple when their report is gone and the drive is dead.

Comment Re:LOL Carl Sagan....scientist? not (Score 3, Insightful) 799

I don't think the submitter was asking for a Sunday school answers to a request for science instruction. While it is perfectly acceptable to use God to fill the holes in knowledge for the time being (if a society must because it has a sever phobia of areas of uncertainty and doubt), it is not acceptable for a society to refuse to acknowledge scientific findings, or refuse the future possibility of what science may find simply because it has already answered that particular question with the stock "The Creator did it."

Comment Re:Mythbusters does it (Score 2, Insightful) 799

At least they GET data rather than just basing their opinions what they're fed. Honestly, when was the last time you did a thorough scientific experiment in your personal life? I think that personal science involves questioning the status quo, not accepting everything at face value, and figuring out how to answer your questions. Simply because your methods wouldn't stand up to rigorous testing doesn't mean that you can't use it to make good decisions. Ultimately I think that is the role of science in peoples lives, to answer questions and aid in decisions.

While I don't always agree with the mythbuster's methods, at least they don't sit around waiting for the talking heads to hand down the truth from on high. The scientific spirit of the program is strong if the flesh is sometimes weak.

P.S. Relying entirely on mythbusters for your science is just as bad as blindly believing the news (New study! Polyester socks triple your risk factor for big left toe cuticle cancer (from .000000003% to .000000009%) so avoid cotton/poly blends like the plague! (they also make you fat and are linked to male pattern baldness!!!)) /sarcasm

Slashdot Top Deals

An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.

Working...