Good to the last drop.

I am a meat popsicle.

Post volume seemed to be the same last week as it was the week before and this week thus far.

There was significantly less bitching about beta.

I still recommend alterslash.org for all your slashdot skimming needs.

Wrong approach. You need to get your car's engine to throw monkey wrenches. Reverse the polarity of the monkey wrench beam, if you will.

Remember when you trusted Google more than Microsoft or Apple?
Remember when you trusted Apple more than Microsoft?
Remember when you trusted Microsoft? (I kid, I kid (perhaps))
Being worthy of trust in the recent past does not grant anyone a blank check for current or future actions.

They will not harm the whales. Only the petunias.

Dude. We don't read TFA, what makes you think we read the summary? Even if we do, we are only looking for misspellings, grammar errors, or somesuch.

Pffft. Content. Who comes to /. for content?

http://dresdencodak.com/2009/0...

Been done.

Good grief.

The "all" in this case is describing the extent of "fault", not the extent of "y'all". The test is if we replace "y'all" with some other noun. "It's all Fred's fault." Clearly we are not referring to some multitude of individuals as "all Fred", rather we are assigning all the fault to Fred.

Similarly, it is not too much to expect that appending an apostrophe and "s" could create a possessive form of "y'all".

Finally, there is the "you" (for second person singular), "y'all" (for second person plural), and "all y'all" (for second person collective). I suppose if the GP really wanted to yank your chain, the post could have been written "It's all all y'all's fault." I agree that would sound odd.

Activities that do not involve /.

Exactly.

Sometimes I try to do things and it just doesn't work out the way I wanted to. ...
All I wanted was a Pepsi.

Just need to figure out how to burn the flag with a gun. Then it will be okay.

Good management is good for the organization. But, there is no customer that will pay more to a vendor because they have good management. Irrespective of what the inflated compensation packages of various members of management may suggest.

You know, it occurs to me that we have had the technology to send a one-way mission since about 1998. Though it would be more mass-efficient to just shoot the astronauts on the launch pad. Think of all the savings on food, water, air, and radiation shielding.