Comment Re:Allow it... (Score 1) 340
You need to go to better movie theaters. Alamo Drafthouse is the best and got some good publicity when they did this a couple years ago.
http://drafthouse.com/blog/entry/she_texted._we_kicked_her_out
You need to go to better movie theaters. Alamo Drafthouse is the best and got some good publicity when they did this a couple years ago.
http://drafthouse.com/blog/entry/she_texted._we_kicked_her_out
From the letter:
Fact: The U.S. spent $502 billion subsidizing fossil fuels in 2011. This is the result of directly lowered prices, tax breaks and failing to properly price carbon’s negative externalities.
What pricetag is he attaching to carbon's negative externalities? This article, cited in a comment on an earlier Slashdot story on solar energy, pegs it at $1 trillion, and it seems like they asked Austin Powers what he thought it should be. What is Khosla's pricetag for carbon externalities, and where did he get it?
Pick a "brininess" and energy consumption you want to run at. By definition, the brine produced will be more concentrated than the ocean water flowing into your plant. Run the more-concentrated brine and less-concentrated ocean water through this power system and produce whatever energy you can get from it. It will always be less than the energy that you used to produce the freshwater+brine, but it will always be more than 0 which is what you get if you dump the brine back into the ocean. How you want to slide the bars in terms of brininess and energy consumption is up to you. But either way, you're ahead with this system. Get it?
Yes, desalination obviously requires more energy than you get out of this method. But the point of the desalination is not energy production, it's freshwater production. You get freshwater out of your desalination plant. That requires using some amount of energy X. Instead of dumping the waste product of the desalination plant (highly-concentrated brine) somewhere, you use it with one of these devices to produce some amount of energy Y where Y is less than X.
The net result is that you end up with freshwater, and instead of spending X energy to get it, you had to spend only (X - Y) energy.
Because meth is illegal, a person who's using it doesn't advertize the fact. So how would you recognize anyone who used it in moderation?
I wouldn't, of course. As I've acknowledge three times now, I'm no expert on meth usage. But we have all sorts of data on usage for all sorts of illegal drugs. Where is the data on casual meth usage? This is now the third time I've asked for it.
And please don't wikipedia-link me stupid crap. That's a Slashdot addiction that has got to stop.
Do you realize said opium dens were run by the British with the specific goal of selling as much opium as possible, and as such didn't have any of the safeguards I proposed?
So in your meth dens, the dens would not be run with the intent to sell as much meth as possible? Is that how a licensed liquor establishment (a bar) operates?
Start here [wikipedia.org].
That link has a chart that lists heroin and cocaine (two drugs I called out as bad candidates for legalization) as very harmful. It lists meth as more harmful than alcohol. It has no information on addiction rate. It does have information on how dependent an addict is on the drug.
Higher latency between the memory and the GPU which is KEY to a GPU performance.
Latency doesn't matter very much for GPU. A little, but not much. Bandwidth is what matters for GPU. (Latency matters for CPU tasks.) As long as the GPU has enough buffer depth to cover the latency to and from memory (which it certainly does), the memory bandwidth is what will keep the GPU pipelines completely full.
If a subordinate asks you a pertinent question, look at him as if he had lost his senses. When he looks down, paraphrase the question back at him.