Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Whats next? (Score 2) 1219

How about altering the penalties for DUI and reckless/careless driving, and speeding based upon the weight or dangerousness of the vehicle you are driving? Something like 10 cents/pound or something. Why should someone drunk on a moped who is likely only going to hurt himself face the same penalty as someone driving a dump truck while drunk?

Because the 18-wheeler who's trying to avoid flattening the drunken moped driver could cause a 50-car pileup and kill multiple people. It's not always about what you hit. Sometimes, it's about what happens to those trying to avoid you.

Comment Re:Filed by Ken Cuccinelli (Score 1) 1505

Insurance companies are not charities, they do not exist to support the indigent and the sick. They can only function if people pay premiums in before getting money back out.

To be honest, insurance companies also work because they'll use any excuse to deny a claim, even the most obscure technicality. And with some types of insurance (such as car insurance in Canada), if you have the gall to submit a claim, your premiums might go up! They don't care that your previous premiums might have paid for your claim ten times over. They want maximum input with (ideally) no output.

Comment Re:When did progress... (Score 1) 895

I'm sure many foreigners might jump on in disagreement if they look at how it was passed. There wasn't enough time to read and comprehend the bill before the vote. One senator was called out for saying you need 2 days and 2 lawyers just to read and understand the bill, and somehow that was not an expense he found acceptable before voting for it. Another said we won't know what's in the bill until after it passes which seemed ok for them but isn't for the people. We elect and pay politicians to create legislation, not rubber stamp someone else' crap and spend the next 2 months wondering what they made into law. The debate on the bill was very little if any- it almost seemed as if some in the government was afraid that if the public knew what was in the bill, they wouldn't like it(which turned out to be a reality).

I'm confused. Are we talking about the USAPATRIOT Act all of a sudden? Because that sounds exactly like what happened a bunch of times after 9/11. Where the hell was all this outrage when they were taking your rights away after 9/11?

Comment Re:Is it just D&D ? (Score 1) 496

The stated goals of prisons are to rehabilitate,

Sure, rehabilitation might prevent future crimes by the same offenders, but some of us think prison should be more about punishment instead of rehabilitation. If prison was an extremely hard punishment, to the point that people were actively scared of going, it would deter more people from committing crimes in the first place.

Or make them more likely to make sure there are no witnesses...

Comment Re:The government *does* have the right !! (Score 3, Interesting) 246

The 4th amendment does not apply. As with every other country, the US considers domestic law to only apply when you are inside the country. If you have not yet cleared customs, you are technically not in the country. Therefore, you do not benefit from the protections of domestic law. This may seem like quibbling, but it is how every country controls its borders.

Are you then protected by the domestic laws of the country you're leaving, or have you entered some sort of fairy tale (the bad ones with blood and nightmares) limbo place where you have no rights whatsoever? I wonder what other rights they can ignore under the pretext that you're "not in the country yet".

PC Games (Games)

EA Shutting Down Video Game Servers Prematurely 341

Spacezilla writes "EA is dropping the bomb on a number of their video game servers, shutting down the online fun for many of their Xbox 360, PC and PlayStation 3 games. Not only is the inclusion of PS3 and Xbox 360 titles odd, the date the games were released is even more surprising. Yes, Madden 07 and 08 are included in the shutdown... but Madden 09 on all consoles as well?"

Comment Re:he said (Score 1) 103

A lot of the world is also *against* you as I discovered after I walked in a Tea Party protest. I thought it was common sense - The current national debt is $120,000 per home, projected to be $200,000 by 2016, and yet the Congress is still spending money like mad. It needs to stop.

But no. Instead I was called an "astroturfer" which is wrong because I don't get paid. Then I was labeled a "racist" but that's also not true; and frankly insulting. Even if Hillary was president or McCain president, I'd still protest because I see us spending ourselves into a hole that we'll never escape. Common sense position? Apparently not; some Americans want the debt to climb to ~$200,000 per home.

"More of the world is with you than you think," is only half the story. A lot of the world is against you, and they want MORE government control, not less They want censorship. They want the Patriot Act. They want more spending.

Oh yes. *Now* the debt is a problem. Where the hell were the Tea Party people when the US was entering into a grossly expensive and unnecessary war while cutting taxes? That. there, is why the Tea Party people are being called astroturfers: because they seem to have sprung up from nowhere to protest budgetary policies as if the debt was the current administration's fault.

Here's an idea for you: Stop trying to make the world better for your corporations at gunpoint, and take care of your population. If you cut the army's budget and put that into health care, you'd be set. But noooooo! Guns and tanks, and more precisely the companies that make them, are a lot more important than actual people.

XBox (Games)

Modded Xbox Bans Prompt EFF Warning About Terms of Service 254

Last month we discussed news that Microsoft had banned hundreds of thousands of Xbox users for using modified consoles. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has now pointed to this round of bans as a prime example of the power given to providers of online services through 'Terms of Service' and other usage agreements. "No matter how much we rely on them to get on with our everyday lives, access to online services — like email, social networking sites, and (wait for it) online gaming — can never be guaranteed. ... he who writes the TOS makes the rules, and when it comes to enforcing them, the service provider often behaves as though it is also the judge, jury and executioner. ... While the mass ban provides a useful illustration of their danger, these terms can be found in nearly all TOS agreements for all kinds of services. There have been virtually no legal challenges to these kinds of arbitrary termination clauses, but we imagine this will be a growth area for lawyers."

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics

Working...