I'm sorry if your reasoning is so inconsistent that even a basic sequence of analogies causes it to fall apart like the shaky bullshit that it is.

Also, I love how you call me MrNazi while you're the one advocating for heavy handed police action against protesters. The irony is delectable.

Lovely pretzel you've tied yourself up into.
I don't know what the fuck you're on about, this whole article is about how those protesters have been arrested. What would you prefer? To have had the police beat them all with nightsticks and shoot them Tiananmen Square style? Exactly what you're claiming Democrats don't allow to happen, has just happened.

I was only pointing out the idiocy of Americans getting on their high horse and pointing fingers at what they claim are autocracies, and in the same breath bitching about how much of an inconvenience it is to have to put up with people protesting to make an important point.

And I'm 100% behind you on being sick of the "BUT CHIIIIINA" retort every time someone points out what a shithole the USA has become for 95% of it's population.

No, I assert that they protested in a manner that was just disruptive enough to get people's attention.
This was the right thing to do. I understand that it's intrusive and that people were inconvenienced, but that's an appropriate price to pay for a society that decides that we allow one another to get each others attention in a way that is sometimes disruptive.

Saying that your accusations of rape were fabricated is not being an apologist for rape.

Try again.

Ok so what exactly are you whining about then?

Well true, but that only strengthens my point.

lol yea that's definitely the conclusion to come to when the lack of evidence is pointed out.

Because the government can and will ignore any protest that doesn't interfere with establishment interests.

A revolution begins with a protest. A protest gone unheard turns into something more, then finally a revolution.

You know, the four boxes, used in the right order.

lol your backflips are getting hard to follow. You're just defining away the circumstances to suit your nonsensical point of view.

So they're crossing a line knowing full well there maybe be consequences. If you have a problem with those consequences then feel free to write your local congressman and tell him you feel the consequences are too light.

So then aren't they doing what they are doing and facing the consequences?

Ah yes. The visitor who essentially said what she was told to say despite being shown NO evidence.

Also I love it how Israel calls the UN a bunch of liars and Hamas collaborators except when they parrot the desired line. At that point the UN becomes totally credible and the last word on anything.

Ah, so it would be fine if the protesters brought guns and called it a revolution then?