Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Happened to me (Score 1) 281

Sounds to me like you didn't put ANY effort into preserving the battery.

"a lot" of effort would have involved learning what kinds of things drain the battery beforehand and then avoiding them. Apple has a web page devoted to eeking the most you can get out of your iphone battery at http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html

A minimal amount of effort would have been turning the thing off, because turning a battery powered device off to save the batteries isn't exactly a revolutionary idea.

So what exactly did "a lot of effort" entail?

Comment Re:Why destroyed? (Score 5, Informative) 70

People basically had bots (or a bunch of their friends) play their songs over and over allow them to rack up large play numbers.

I believe Amazon charges a significant fee to use their borrowing service (IIRC you need Amazon Prime) and puts limits on the number of books you can take out in a given period of time, so this shouldn't be an issue with them.

Comment Re:Proving something negative is impossible (Score 1) 324

By the classical definition of work, if the intended goal is to move the object, the initial push's energy continues to perform an infinite amount of that work, unless the energy is diffused or negated.

Or are you trying to redefine work?

You seem to be the one who is trying to redefine work. Work = Force * Distance. One the "initial push" is over, Force becomes zero, and any further movement results in zero work.

Comment Re:Not the answer (Score 5, Informative) 123

(as an aside, I have to admit that if I was on the Apollo 10 mission and everything was working out, I'd be tempted to yell "Fuck you, Neil!" into my radio and land on the Moon. What's NASA gonna do?)

Watch as you die on the moon because the ascent stage lacked the fuel needed to return the Lunar Module to the Command Module from the surface of the moon.

Comment Re:Statstical analysis (Score 1) 257

The thing that gets glossed over is that the "moneyball" draft of 2002 wasn't very good. Oakland had several first round picks and only the first two (Nick Swisher, and Joe Blanton) did anything significant in majors. Add to that the fact that a number of good players who had the sabermetric stats to suggest they were good were ignored, often for some really stupid reasons.

If Beane had really stopped looking at the human equation he would have drafted Prince Fielder.

Comment Re:Einstein replied "Check your measurements, son" (Score 1) 1088

You know, people keep saying that these guys are geniuses and would spot trivial errors but I can only think of two things when I read that:

1) I work in research with some incredibly smart people, and see them make the occasional really dumb mistake. All it takes is one stupid error made by some guy years ago that never rechecked to mess things up.

2) I can still very vividly remember when Lyne, Bailes & Shemar announced they detected a planet around a pulsar by detecting the pulsars timing changing and in the end it turned out they didn't account for the movement of the Earth correctly.

Slashdot Top Deals

We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully integrated.

Working...