Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites (Score 1) 430

Salvation through faith in God and suffering are connected by hope. See Romans 5:

Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous person, though for a good person someone might possibly dare to die. But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

Comment Re:No, no I heared dis befoe (Score 1) 715

Do you think that after 37 years in the US Army, I didn't hear, 'You won't let me do it because I am a girl or female)" argument? Say OK, do it and then have have to listen to them complain about getting sand in their vagina!

Fair point, but I have to say that hearing guys complain about the chafing their wedding tackle is getting after a week in the desert wears a little thin after a while.

Comment Re:Where? (Score 0) 715

It is axiomatic to rational thought that assertions must be supported. You can't prove everything, but neither can you simply take everything for granted (or even most things).

My point exactly. You're the one who said that unprovable assumptions are invalid.

So unless you can provide a compelling reason why we should treat it as an axiom that all people have bias (known or unknown), you have no ground to stand on.

If you've done any work in epistemology over the last fifty years you'd be well aware that the biggest problem with bias is that we're not always aware of it, and even when we are we don't always know what to do with it. Any observation we make about the world has to be interpreted before we can use it to make statements about the world and is therefore suspect.

The best we can do is minimise the effect by separating raw observation from interpretation. That's why double blind testing is the gold standard in science. That's easy in physics and chemistry, but hard in armchair sociology. It's also why I'm glad when job applicants don't put their gender or date of birth on their résumés.

Comment Re:Where? (Score 0) 715

I think if you don't realize your bias then you are unwittingly probably part of the problem.

You're making the (unprovable, and thus invalid) assumption that everyone has bias, whether they know it or not. That's ridiculous.

So you're assuming that unprovable assumptions are invalid. Could you please prove that and thus validate your claim?

Comment Re:What!? (Score 1) 267

I think you miss the parent's point. The problem he(?) has is that if he is to get a place at the shelter he has to spend the day running around doing busy work to keep the shelter's stats up instead of looking for work/accommodation/whatever.

I've seen people miss job interviews because their case worker has forced them to attend classes on how to handle job interviews.

Comment Re:T3000 (Score 1) 236

+1 to Westfield. I'm surprised Gerry Harvey hasn't considered this.

Gerry Harvey will rant about how all the overseas companies are screwing you for your info it on Today Tonight, then introduce his own version of the scheme two weeks later with great fanfare and Australian made stickers. Bogans everywhere will line up to buy a second phone, just to feel the love.

Comment Re:Why not just ride a bike? (Score 1) 115

When I read the summary I thought it might have gone side to side and projected streeview on the wall. Whilst I'd much rather be outside on a real bike I do spend a lot of time in crank classes. I'd love to be able to load up a classic bike ride from Europe and get going without worrying about idiot drivers or bike riders who have more expensive equipment than me.

Comment Christmas Day (Score 1) 326

I can just imagine the Tennants and Davidson/Moffetts getting together for Christmas lunch. Swapping stories about the good old days, complaining about these new Doctors who couldn't tell an Abzorbaloff from a Toclafane, even with dampeners on their sonic screwdrivers.

And then they tune in to watch the new Christmas special. Ah, good times...

Comment Re:A correction, if I may. (Score 1) 100

The Australian Senate is the house of review - the upper house. It is the House of Representatives that is the lower house, and that introduces legislation. The legislation passed the House of Representatives; it passed with amendments in the Senate; and now the House of Representatives needs to vote on those amendments (it looks likely that they will pass).

A slight correction of my own: it reads like you're suggesting the Senate can't introduce legislation. They can introduce most types of legislation except appropriation and taxation bills. In practice you're probably right though---most legislation seems to originate in the House of Reps.

Comment Re:Hate to say I told ya so (Score 1) 77

The kind of porn people regularly access on the Internet has been "illegal" in every state of Australia (but not the territories) for a long time now. Why do people find it so surprising that those-who-like-to-censor would apply the same standard to Internet porn that they do to video tape porn?

I agree with your point, but this is a Federal matter, not a State one. The states have happily censored everything for a long time now, but the Feds have stayed right out of it, even when they have the power to stop the Territories selling porn.

Still, your point is a good one. I know far too many people who see the parallel with TV and video and wonder what the problem is with a bit of censorship.

I do find it odd that SBS---which goes to great lengths to explore the pale blue area between porn and erotica is owned by the federal government. If they were really serious about censorship, that'd be a very easy place to start! AH, politics...

Slashdot Top Deals

According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.

Working...