Firstly, the specification of C anf C++ standard library is governed by the corresponding standard commitee. Microsoft has absolutely no authority to "banish" anything from neither C nor C++. They can deprecate it in their
Secondly, the tryly unsafe and useless functions in the C standard library are the functions like "gets", which offer absolutely no protection agains buffer overflow, regardless of how careful the develoiper is. Functions like 'memcpy', on the other hand, offer sufficient protection to a qualified developer. There's absolutely no sentiment against these functions in C/C++ community and there is absolutely no possiblity of these functions to get deprecated as long as C language exists.
Obviously, the entire post was crafted with one and only purpose in mind: to make a trollish statement about "nonbelievers who view death as the end of existence, the annihilation of consciousness and the self". The rest was added for the sole purpose to make the trolling less obvious.
There has never been a megapixel war in the pro-world. Pro-world and the advanced amateurs have always been primarily noise-conscious and have always ignored the megapixel wars. The fight for the sensor size is nothing else than the fight for the photosite size with constant mexapixel count.
K&R is not defined well enough (and too buggy in the parts where it is actually defined) to justify a meaningfull application of the term "compliance" to it. "Compliance with K&R" is an oxymoron. Meaningful compliance begins from C89/90, but alas IOCCC does not require that. In fact, according to the official rules, IOCCC is not really IO[C]CC, but rather IO[GCC]CC. Not surprisingly, most IOCCC entries actually demonstrate a rather poor knowledge of C.
He he he. Apparently, you are unaware of the fact that "agnorant" is a perfectly cromulent word these days. (Welcome to America...)
Americans don't "leave out" the 'u' in 'colour'. Americans simply don't know it is supposed to be there in the first place. The agnorant "leave out" theory is nothing more than a primitive way to cover up their embarrassment when they finally discover that it is actually spelled with 'u'.
The word 'evolution', when used in the contexts like this one, is supposed to mean the progressive developments in the language, not just any arbitrary change. The distortions of English language introduced by virtually illiterate Americans don't qualify as evolution.
That "Russian" attack on Estonia turned out to be Estonian in the end. The there was another "Russian" attack on USA, which turned out the be Chinese. Now we have a "Russian" attack again... These, combined with recent silly PR campaign "warning" the US citizens of the dangers of visiting Russian and ex-USSR domains, is obviously staged in order to prepare the US population for the forthcoming internet censorship measures in the US. Apparently, the emergence of Russian sources presenting information in English does not sit well with federal US brainwashing/propaganda structures. Expect this PR campaign to continue. I wonder what BS will they put out next.
"No job too big; no fee too big!" -- Dr. Peter Venkman, "Ghost-busters"