By definition of the exclusivity deal, B&N can't make the e-book version of the book available, and so if they're literally unable to make that version of the book available, how could they honestly say that they can make the "book available [on the nook], anytime"?

You have no barometer that tells you when information is relevant, or when more information is necessary. You're a complete failure at this job, you're ineptitude makes the reader have to do more work, so please do us a favor and quit, and if you don't quit, I hope your superiors read this post and understand that you should be fired.

Get rid of AC, and make shitheaded idiots like "apk" sign up for an account so his ignorant, aggressive, asperger ramblings can be banned.

In regard to your criticism [that it]:

Please explain how the windspeed of "the average winter storm on the Oregon Coast" has fuckall to do with the average windspeeds as experienced by the East Coast (and the regulations guiding the engineering of their infrastructure), along with how winterstorms -- which generally result in exhibiting snowfall -- has fuckall to do with the rainfall produced by summer storms.

Additionally, please discuss (with examples) tools that should have been used as a means of providing an accurate prediction of expected windspeeds: 48 hours, 36 hours, 24 hours, and 12 hours in advance of the storm making landfall.

Answers to essay questions may be provided in as many words as the student requires in order to answer the question with full intellectual honesty, along with proof that they're not an armchair, hind-sighted, fucking idiot.

So far, all I've received as spam, and one har-dee-har, "So all we get is 5 inches?"

I hate to "steam" you even more, but NASA disagrees with your "JWSC !- Hubble successor" belief.

Webb often gets called the replacement for Hubble, but we prefer to call it a successor. After all, Webb is the scientific successor to Hubble; its science goals were motivated by results from Hubble. Hubble's science pushed us to look to longer wavelengths to "go beyond" what Hubble has already done. In particular, more distant objects are more highly redshifted, and their light is pushed from the UV and optical into the near-infrared.

...which is the first paragraph on their page addressing whether or not Webb is Hubble's successor. I don't mean to imply that they're an authoritative voice or anything on the subject, but surely their opinion should be weighed into your semantics argument?