Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: How to Sheperd an In-Law Out of a ChemTrail Conspiracy 1

An anonymous reader writes: Being stuck in this situation where a few times every year I have to spend (increasing amounts of) time listening to a sibling getting sucked into these conspiracy ideas (mostly about fuming aeroplanes). Are there sites that deal with these questions without being rude or condescending? The bloke is scientifically illiterate but is interested in the subject (science in general) (and misinterprets everything he reads about it). Has anyone found a way and/or source of information to smoothly deal with this? I just want to stay nice but I have less than no time (or real interest) to properly search the subject. Thanks.

Comment Re:Sick Society (Score 1) 253

So, you mean a state like Texas - loose gun control - with a 2012 murder rate of 4.4 (per 100,000 people) versus a state like New York - tight gun control - with a rate of 3.5? Which is the lower number? See http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.or... . Better yet, look at the ranking by murder rate -
and tell me if you think the top of the list - the high murder-rate states - Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Michigan, South Carolina, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware, Tennessee, and Arkansas - sounds like a bunch of states with tight gun control laws?

Comment Re:As little as possible (Score 1) 373

In fact, APL is the epitome of elegance in computer programming languages: http://sharonhines.com/interne... (one random, recent example of many).

One simple example: some languages have a way to do matrix multiplication but it's often a clunky function call or an odd, non-standard piece of notation (I'm looking at you, Matlab). APL doesn't just do matrix multiply but generalizes the very concept of it so that you can do a generalized inner product that reduces to matrix multiply when the functions supplied to it are multiplication and addition.

Ignorance of the language, common and widespread though it is, is not the same as an actual reason for dismissing it.

Comment A thin wedge against free speech (Score 1) 128

These laws against recording in public are an early step toward curtailing freedom of speech. The recent popularity of variations on this, particularly with regard toward laws against recording police officers should be a tip-off.

We already have laws that differentiate between what's acceptable in public versus private space: walking around naked, for instance. Blurring this line looks like something that favors those who would erode and limit the public space.

Comment Quality / $ (Score 1) 379

As long as the quality of work continues to be an imponderable - not sure why this still is the case, unless management continues to remain clueless - decisions will be made only based on how much money someone costs, and older people want more money. Perhaps they imagine that experience is valuable.

Submission + - High-Protein Diet Considered Harmful - who wants to hear that? (wsj.com)

DavidHumus writes: There's a report in the Wall Street Journal recently on two studies showing an association between low-protein, high-carbohydrate diets and longevity. The TL;DR is "eating a lot of meat (and other animal-derived protein like cheese) in middle-age lowers longevity but the same things help longevity after the age of 65."

These studies are not too surprising if you follow this sort of thing. What is perhaps more interesting is the strong reaction against this article and articles like it. The comments on the article range from the merely dismissive — "...this study means nothing in the real world" — to the abusive — "what the food nazi's approve....grass, cardboard, tofu, yogurt" and "just more commie propaganda to get americans to eat grass and tree bark like our North Korean comrades".

What's interesting is that you don't get this sort of thing only from WSJ readers — many /. responders parrot the same sort of irrelevant nonsense upon encountering a scientific study pointing to conclusions they don't like: the study "is biased", "fails to account for X", "was based on mice so doesn't apply", and so on with no evidence the responder has looked at (or even understood) at the actual research, of course.

What's also interesting, perhaps not surprisingly, is the corresponding prevalent confusion between information based on empirical evidence and notions from popular culture: many commenting on the article seem to think that there was scientific support for some of the recent high-protein diet fads — that scientists "keep changing their minds".

Submission + - Eating meat and cheese may be as bad as smoking (medicalxpress.com)

DavidHumus writes: According to an article on medicalxpress.com:

In a new study that tracked a large sample of adults for nearly two decades, researchers have found that eating a diet rich in animal proteins during middle age makes you four times more likely to die of cancer than someone with a low-protein diet—a mortality risk factor comparable to smoking.

Uh-oh, not only should I be a vegetarian, maybe I should be vegan.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...