Comment Turn stick figures into photos? (Score 3, Interesting) 193
Someone should take all the XKCD comics, mark 'em up a bit, turn 'em into nice pictures, and
Someone should take all the XKCD comics, mark 'em up a bit, turn 'em into nice pictures, and
Pics or it didn't happen.
However, I've only been to five US states (unless you count British Colombia)
They would very much prefer that you didn't.
A detailed liveblog of the event with a ton of screenshots is available at Engadget.
You know, you don't really take "screenshots" of real life. Most people just call them "photos".
The use of the "or" conjunction, which in English is semantically equivalent to a logical XOR.
_Usually_ equivalent to XOR. Consider the following statement:
"It will rain today or tomorrow".
If, in fact, it rained today _and_ tomorrow, would you consider the statement false? Most people wouldn't. Therefore, in that particular case, English "or" is equivalent to logical OR not XOR.
Buy a damned computer, or one of the mobiles you can install Linux on.
Maybe you should RTFA before posting
Of course there are a million machines you can install Linux on, but the PS3 was particularly nice because of its Cell architecture. That allowed for some super-computer like performance for a low, low price. Lots of research institutions used PS3 clusters for low cost supercomputing. Now that future is jeopardized.
Speaking of "getting your facts right"
Breaking RSA is something that is not expected for many decades
Um, [citation needed] much? Seriously does anyone expect RSA to be broken in the next few decades?
Certainly much longer key lengths will be brute-forceable in the next few decades, but that's a far cry from coming up with a polynomial time algorithm that breaks RSA.
Concepts are (were) cool. But let's be realistic: unless you're doing a lot of template library programming, you wouldn't use them much.
I think much cooler additions are lamda functions, move semantics (rvalue references), auto keyword and others. Also additions to the standard library like threading and decent smart pointers.
Once you've reverted the hash back to salt+plaintext, it's *much* easier to remove the salt (often some string concatenated with the plaintext).
Often? That's the definition of salt.
Also, rainbow tables don't revert the hash back to salt+plaintext. Rainbow Tables don't work if salt was (correctly) used. Well, I guess you could make a set of RTs for every possible salt value
I thought the prevelance of using salts with hashes obsoleted rainbow tables years ago.
True. Correctly salting your password hashes will make rainbow tables useless.
But
(Really? No takers? Huh. Well, a geek's gotta do what a geek's gotta do:)
NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!!
When you have a good dictator, things are generally pretty
good. The trick is to avoid the bad dictator.
That is indeed the trick. The fact is, the harm that bad dictators cause greatly outweighs any good that "good" dictators provide. And a dictator system, once in place, is very hard to get rid of.
Also, I feel suspicious of the idea that there are "good" dictators. Some may start out good, but power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Call me when someone ports Nethack to the iPhone. Or figures out a good mobile device type interface for roguelikes in general.
ls | grep
amiright?
"When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest." -- Bullwinkle Moose