While Louisiana is lauded as a corrupt government every judge will face a conflict of interest at some point in their career, fortunately for most cases, interpretation of the law is pretty straight forward, above all it's not up to judge's whims or personal preference as much as this yahoo article implies. If they do appeal the case, which is certainly their right, they will have to have more justifiable grounds to do so, and while going through an appeals process essentially grants their pause anyway...
Unless they followed his track record on rulings and gathered peer opinions on how he rolls this kind of "news" isn't really news. Now, if he has a history of loose reasoning or this is particularly out of character it's worth noting.
Now real news and conflicts of interest do exist, but this looks like a 1-liner to get hits more than any serious follow-up investigation. The general public is certainly welcome to say it's good/bad to drill, but when you leave a precedence binding paper trail, personal interests are usually left out.
The rule on staying alive as a forecaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn