Sure. I'd care to hear it. If anything you just said was correct. But it's not.

"Questioning" evolution isn't science. Presenting evidence and tests to counter specific claims made by evolution would be. And scientists do that. Creationists try, and fail, a lot.

This is simple. Teaching about science and logic is okay, teaching about religion is not. When science and logic contradict religion, teaching that they do, isn't a problem. The position isn't to disparage religion, it's to teach science and logic. That religion is disparaged by that automatically is only religion's fault.

False dichotomy. The other possibility is "we have no idea."

Uh. That's a pretty naive view of what's at stake.

She's an employee of the Government. Congress made a law to support her job. If she advocates something against the first amendment, while fulfilling her job duties, then congress has made a law that violates the first amendment.

It can't be both. The scientific opinion is that "we don't have any evidence that said God exists, or did exist, so let's not invent facts." Occam's razor.

First a story about how .Net is being ignored. And now a story whose headline claims MS has been giving priority to .Net.

Ahh, slashdot.

I really wish I knew what you meant by "go soft on .Net". It's the premier development platform for the most widely distributed desktop and server OS on the planet. And their new phones use it.

Yeah. I don't know what you mean.

CS 5 Prem is like, $1700.

I'm a big fan of the subscription stuff they offer now.

"You'll hate us less than Facebook" seems to be working for Google+.

The 'work' involves searching for a very hard to find hash. The result has to be legitimately random, in order to prevent tampering.

If you can figure out how to process 'real data' and still keep it 'random', then you can certainly raise it.

Doesn't really help for PLAIN or LOGIN methods though, does it?

Or even DIGEST, really. That stuffs simple to break.

Wow seems i"m late to this party.

All patents should be voided on the grounds that every action is simply an expression of existing physical laws. When it comes down to it, every idea is really nothing more than universal physical laws playing out in people's heads.

I got a free pizza out of the deal. I'm cool with this.