Yet plenty of "normal" safes use the exact same methods and technologies. The only difference if whats inside the safe. If I take a normal safe and put a gun in it is it suddenly a gun safe? If a "Gun" safe has no guns in it is it still a "Gun" safe?

Care to elaborate hot shot? I own a liberty and 2 stack ons.

I agree with everything you said, hence why I included "locked cabinets" in my comment. But my other comment holds true, there is no difference in technology between "Gun" safes and normal safes.

These are all images that came up in the search. Try again. again THE TECHNOLOGIES BETWEEN SAFES AND "GUN" SAFES IS NO DIFFERENT.

http://www.gunsafereviews.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/gunvault-mv500-std-microvault-pistol-gun-safe.jpg

http://d260svfu9a9tyc.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/gunvault3.gif

http://plasticstorageboxesinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/HOMAK-Bestselling-Biometric-Gun-Safe.jpg

http://biometricgunsafereviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/locksaf-biometric-gun-safe.jpg

Which as a gun owner can tell you is not really any different from normal safes or locked cabinets. Yes there are companies that specifically cater to that market, but the technologies arent any different.

1. he stated it was "low powered" for a rifle.

2. joules doesnt really give you more than the muzzle energy, and a rounds ability to transfer kinetic energy into the target is much more important.a round with a million joules but doesnt expand so it doesnt create nearly as much permanent and temporary crush cavity as a good old .45 JHP with 800 joules that expands and imparts most of its energy into the target

3. A .223 ROUND DOES NOT TUMBLE. THEY FRAGMENT.

Actually that is entirely incorrect. Notice that the second amendment separates the militia from the people. They are not one in the same. The second part is specifically what matters "The right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The first part I believe (though I am not an English major) is called a preamble and simply states the reason for the rest of the sentence.

Actually that isnt true as an individual is free to manufacture a lower if they wish. Thats why they have a thing called an 80% lower or a AK flat receiver. So you are wrong.

Yes because hyperbole often needs to be cited... =\

Didnt you hear? Any politician that does something the left doesnt like is automatically called a republican. Its like a reverse No True Scotsman.

Ok, so what are your facts? You still havnt told us what they are.

Here is a rundown of your proposed explanations

1. God put junk code in our DNA for no good reason. It doesn't do anything, its just there.

2. God caused the exact same viral interaction to occur in all life at the same time including animals.

3. Im not really sure what you were going for in this explanation, but Im guessing you think that its just a coincidence that we found this specific sequence (and by sequence I mean the exact same sequence of thousands of base pairs) of DNA across thousands of species.

Two random mutations do not have to evolve at the exact same time to produce a male and a female...

There are plenty of animals that are capable of reproducing sexually AND asexually (In fact many lower mammals are capable of this). It turns out that sexual reproduction has many advantages however in a pinch there are plenty of Multi-celled lifeforms that can reproduce entirely on their own. Maybe the fact that you limited your viewpoint strictly to the farm is the problem.

Whats your next argument?

And all upgrades will be delivered through the new Species Upgrade Program called Evolution.

Well, to be fair I could be calling him a hotdog. =D

Uh huh, whatever you say chief.