Think Macbook Air with a detachable keyboard.

How many Macbook Airs are used as business machines? Less than 2% at a guess. So the Surface Pro 3 can aim for less than 1% marketshare in the business machines, since unlike Apple, the brand has less charisma than a donkey.

They're a fantastic business machine. They really are.

How so? What fraction of business users have even considered Windows 8 and above for their desktops / laptops? Less than 5%, if that. A business machine that cannot run Windows 7 or Windows XP is dead on arrival.

Only a foolish business user would willingly throw $700 for a device that lacks a proper keyboard, mouse or network card interface to the company's active directory managed network. Business users need Word, Excel and Outlook; they need to be able to run legacy apps developed years ago, that do not run properly if at all, on Windows 8 and above.

Unless business users can load Windows 7 on the Surface Pro 3, the device will lose another billion bucks for the beast from Redmond. No point having powerful hardware when the software sucks.

If you can get fusion, you don't need to worry about losing the protein. Suppose you have a protein shaped like your chest, with your two arms tied behind your back with a highly unstable bond in the tie. In each hand is a hydrogen atom ball. You enzymatically manufacture the proteins cold, you raise the temperature until the bonds start bursting and driving the nuclei together, and in one out of ten thousand of them you get tunneling fusion... it's good enough.

No, robotic taxis will monetize the poor the same way they do now: by licensing only a limited number of companies to operate the taxis. Today, that mans that Joe Schmoe, who wants to be a taxi driver, has to rent his taxi at a hundred dollars a day from a taxi company that doesn't drive, doesn't properly repair, doesn't upkeep its vehicles.

That keeps him poor, and the prices high, and the other poor poor.

Do the same thing with robotic taxis, and you simply have locked down the poor with yet another set of shackles.

The GP really did have it right.

most of us artists prefer to actually see our lines appear where we are drawing them

Connect a touchscreen monitor with a pen to a normal desktop - problem solved.

Do you mean to say Microsoft is creating an entire range of device just to cater to the fetish of artists drawing and doodling? I wish them all the best of luck.

And smaller phones and desktop computer can't do things a 12" tablet can.

Can you please name a single thing or task that can only be done on a 12" tablet; and not on a phone or desktop? For your information, digitisers, pens and styluses are supported on laptops and desktops too.

they're going after the laptop market.... This will sell ridiculously well in the enterprise.

The laptop is a very long-lived well-researched device that has tons of applications available on that form factor. Running MS Office on a tablet device will have users tearing their hair out and getting aspirin tablets to rid their headaches.

Ah, you're one of those people with only half a brain.

Atleast I allegedly have half a brain. You are confusing creativity and art with a tablet form factor and stylus. Laptops and desktops support styluses, digitisers, pens etc. and have much more capable content creation software than those available on the tablet form factor.

Microsoft is saying they want to make a tablet that is good for content creation. That's why it's bigger. That's why it comes with a pen.

In my view, content creation is best done with keyboard, mouse and a desktop / laptop. What sort of content can be created with a stylus on a tablet? That's neither the best tools nor the most cost effective.

Cadillacs and Toyotas are both good at transporting people from one place to another. A 12" tablet cannot do most things possible on a smaller phone or a larger desktop.

I'll bet they didn't show this 12" screen running any of the legacy windows apps

What do people generally buy tablets for? In my view tablets are best for consuming content, with about 5% input done through keyboard. Except for watching movies, or for super exotic porn watching, 12" is a horrible form factor.

About half the Android tablets I've seen are used for dual purposes - making phone calls, as well as viewing mails, videos, Whatsapp and what not. A 12" tablet for making calls would make as much sense as navigating a 17" screen using touch or keyboard, but no mouse.

Content creation is best done on a laptop or ideally, on a desktop. So a 12" portable device is neither good for consuming content, making phone calls or creating content. So who is the target user for the Surface Pro 3?

I think it's not funny any more. Windows 8 and later do not seem to be operating systems at all, that description seems to have stopped with XP. An OS manages the hardware resources and provides an operating environment for application software to run.

Windows 8 has made it very cumbersome to use the hardware, focusing largely on touch, which is wasted on a desktop. And many legacy application software simply refuse to run on Windows 8 or later. Even simple web based applications are a pain to navigate and use in Windows 8.

So China or elsewhere, people need a decent desktop operating system, and Microsoft seems to have exited that business.

Microsoft seems a totally confused company at the moment. I bet more than 50% of all tablets are 7" screen size or less. The reason the iPad at about 10" is good is bcos of touch based apps for that platform.

12" is way too big for a tablet and $700 is about 3 times the ideal price point. This device will get hammered by Android tablets by the low-price customers; and anybody who can afford $700 for a tablet would close their eyes and buy the iPad which has 100 times more useful touch based apps than the Surface Pro.

The desktop OS is best navigated with a keyboard in Microsoft's opinion. The best Surface Pro apps are those designed for the desktop, such as Excel and Word.

Looks like a very confused company determined to throw another $1bn in a vain effort to get 2% marketshare in tablets. Gates or Ballmer or Nadella, nobody seems to have any clue about desktops, tablets or smartphones.

I'm all for exploring ideas that are energy-economically feasible, as well as potentially resource-econemically feasible.

However, I really think that the cold-fusion idea was killed by stupidity prematurely, and --no offense -- I think that for those who want to work on a cheap fusion alternative, they should look at protein-folding to see if there is a way to get nuclei momentarily within a reasonable tunnelling cross section.

Point being, they could work on their protein folding designs on a computer to their heart's content. Then, if they do find something interesting, they can publish that as a theoretical protein model for cold-fusion purposes. Get THAT accepted, and one can then work on DNA recombination to develop the thing.

If the President is in control of the NSA, doesn't it follow that the NSA did this with full Presidential approval in the first place?