Apparently died with Steve.
Don't take yourself too seriously man. It's just the internet.
Except for the new news...that being a bit more concise release date, and the fact that he finally let someone else try it on on camera.
Ya, they do. But so what. I very much enjoy using my bluetoof headset while driving, or whilst typing with both hands, or while working on a cabling job, or any other sort of thing where I need to be on the phone and require both hands. I imagine there would be very many applications where the google glasses could come in handy as well. That being said if you're wearing either a bluetoof or google glasses to make a pretentious fashion statement alone, you should be slapped.
When I first heard of the Project Glass, I thought they had found a way of doing what some Japanese companies have been doing for a while...rather than displaying the image in *front* of your eye, they actually draw the image line by line directly *in* your eye on your retina with lasers. I still hold out hope that this is the long term goal of Project Glass, but who knows. A bit of reading Here
And Here
And Here
According to PCworld, (yaya, whatever) it's the third: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/256370/researchers_identify_stuxnetlike_cyberespionage_malware_called_flame.html
Sorry, all I got.
Is it coincidence that a Russian security firm keeps finding these clandestine state-sponsored Middle-eastern directed malware? Or are US and European security firms simply instructed to look the other way?
Speaking of cars and 2014, aren't we supposed to all be in flying cars by now according to Back to the Future Part II? Why not regulate that into existence. All new cars have to fly by 2015. Then no one will get run over...EVER!! Finally government working for the people!
Why the hell can't *I* choose the safety features of *my* own new car? Maybe I'd rather spend that extra money on a car with traction control, or maybe I have a very limited budget, but just want a basic no-frills new car that won't give me any trouble for the next few years. This just smacks of regulators trying to justify their jobs by creating regulations for the sake of regulations. Cars are really, really safe now. Do you really think that Ford would stop putting seatbelts in cars if the government didn't tell them they had to? The car company that kills fewer of it's customers than its rivals can sell more cars based on this fact. The car company that is consistently killing its customers will likely be out of business soon. I'm not saying there's no place for regulation, but this is getting ridiculous. Maybe next they'll say you can't have a black car because they're harder to see at night, after that, they'll say all cars have to be CalTrans Orange because they're safer. Regulators regulate, regardless of the necessity of regulation. A regulator that doesn't regulate is out of a job.
I wish I had mod points. I was practically screaming at my monitor about parent being modded +4 insightful. I'm holding back on making a political statement regarding economics at this point.
As all those tween girls frantically posting to Slasdot all day.
To thine own self be true. (If not that, at least make some money.)
