Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:the study is bogus (Score 2, Insightful) 336

Don't tell me that capitalism has failed, when the author has failed to make a point at all. This is Marxist B.S., meant to encourage government ownership of broadband connections so they can spy on us and charge us through the roof.

And if you keep telling yourself that enough times you'll eventually convince yourself its true. Either that or you're a comedic genius and I failed to spot the sarcasm. Regardless, I'm having a good laugh at your post right now over here with my cheap, fast broadband that I get because of the government mandated competition laws that my commie country has enacted.

Comment Just Return It (Score 5, Insightful) 435

FFS, if I bought a phone and it didn't work I'd just take the thing back to the shop and get a refund. That way I get my money back so I can buy a different phone as a replacement. With a class-action lawsuit they'll get $5 worth of iTunes vouchers and still have a phone that doesn't work. What planet are these people on?

Comment Re:Foreign markets (Score 1) 396

FFS people read the article. Germany has upheld precisely three software related patents - ones that were specifically tied to other areas like hardware and ones that were definitely not obvious or with any kind of demonstrable prior art. They have thrown out all others. Given there is no precedent system in the EU it means that each case is heard on its merits alone, so those three cases mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. Finally, to quote the article:-

"In fact, more recently the same court has repeatedly upheld the rejection of patent claims to computers and programs operating thereon, as in Rentabilitätsermittlung[30] as well as in Informationsübermittlungsverfahren[31]."

Comment Re:Stupid. (Score 1) 477

a) No they don't. They get granted by the EU Patent Office to anyone who is stupid enough to pay as the EU Patent Office is a commercial entity that will sell anything to anyone. However, they are not enforceable.
b) In what way is Firefox hardware?

So basically, the US can shove it's software patents up its ass. H.264 software patents do NOT apply in Europe - and nor will they - there have already been at least two votes on the subject in the EU parliament that were lobbied for by the industry, and both times the proposal was thrown out - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4655955.stm

Comment Re:Stupid. (Score 1) 477

Software patents will be around for some more time and every user (in the broadest sense; i.e. everyone touching H.264 in any way) is required to get a licence.

Did you not even read the summary? In what way does the people of the USA and South Korea needing a license cover "every user"?

This is a sensible move. It means the rest of the world can move on and ignore all this patent bullshit. It might be bad for the people of the USA, but really, other than Americans who else really cares?

Comment Re:Hmm (Score 1) 568

How about:-

5) They just fucking grow up and vote on new laws according to what they actually believe individually.

All MPs are allowed to introduce legislation to be voted on. Why not just carry on doing this and allowing a free vote every time? We need to tell them to stop being so childish and that voting on strict party lines is no longer acceptable.

For the budget and other national issues, take the 3 most expert people on each subject from each party, and lock them in a room until they agree.

These people are supposed to serve us. We have no constitution only tradition, so there are no rules that can be broken. The result of the election should tell them that the general public are just fed up of the lot of them and the way the current system works. We should take the power back and tell them how to work for us.

Comment Re:Well... (Score 2, Insightful) 180

Exactly. Basically it seems to boil down to the fact that the traders don't actually have a clue how it all works. It's so computerised now with such complex algorithms, that if the market moves in anyway they all have to follow like sheep for fear of getting caught with their pants down. And things are getting worse.

I see two solutions:-

1) Go 100% computerised and just throw in the odd random factor to keep things moving. After all, it's all one big random gamble anyway, may as well just admit it.
2) Rip out all the computers and have the traders actually buy and sell real tangible things again.

Comment Re:Uh, cause that's where everyone's headed? (Score 1) 372

This old rubbish AGAIN. I wish people would stop spouting such misinformed garbage. From Wikipedia:-

In countries where patents on software algorithms are upheld, vendors and commercial users of products which make use of H.264/AVC are expected to pay patent licensing royalties for the patented technology[8] that their products use.

Basically, MPEG-LA only has jurisdiction in the US, so whilst that tough for you guys over there, in the rest of the world no-one has to pay them a bean. It is free to use on your website. And given that the rest of the world is clearly a majority of the people on the internet, firstly you're pissing into the wind, and secondly your mistaken in the fact that you think that the rest of the world cares.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The following is not for the weak of heart or Fundamentalists." -- Dave Barry

Working...