That is a ridiculous exaggeration. There is a huge difference between intentionally excluding the disabled and not taking their needs into consideration.
Nope, it amounts to exactly the same thing.
This kind of hyperbole is why many reasonable people who would otherwise support access for the disabled are turned off by it.
Those people are by definition unreasonable, and as such have to be smacked into doing the right thing.
Yes, they should have planned that ramp 200 years ago when the building was originally built. Hindsight is wonderful.
No business has to operate out of a 200 year old building. If they choose to, there will be many added costs.
Is that really the only choice? I'd rather use that $100M to save 20 lives by reducing pollution, having higher food or safety standards, et al. But if you want to be selfish and kill those 20 to save your kid, I guess I can understand.
There's plenty of money to cut from the military budget to do all of those things.