no, they just don't appear in YOUR profile until you approve it. It will still appear in the tagger's profile. And since you probably share friends with the tagger, those friends are likely to see it in that person's profile.

no right is inherent. That is just wishful thinking.

Nothing like Southpark in my opinion. This is cheap 3-D animation. not the paper cut up style. Of course, they probably meant the content, not the animation.\

Seems to me the success of these groups/people is more just a function of having access to the amount of funds one needs in order to make this a profitable endeavor. Except for the primary discoverer of the game's quirk, it is just people with money/funds taking advantage. Much like any almost sure thing investment that requires a large amount of capital. Only those with the means can benefit. Similar to say investing in stocks, bonds, real estate (assuming a rising market and modicum of investment sense.) Joe Anybody might know of a "sure" thing, but unless he has the money or can convince someone to invest the money to his benefit, he won't be able to take advantage.

"Over 4,000,000,000 years." You need to divide by 2 to take in account nighttime :) more if you want to account for clouds too :) but since you can't own wind or sun (yet) GE doesn't care

I just don't like my fingers being in front of what I'm trying to see. That is why I will never use touchscreens. I am no luddite though. I'm waiting for cybernetic implants or nano-bots technology.

ah but the danger in unstable growth is the desire for more . . and they seem to be doing a pretty good job of it. I feel for the people and for the animals and the environment that might be destroyed because of this. But alas, we must let it play out as it will . . .

It doesn't matter. Almost everyone takes some sort of advantage/liberties at their jobs, especially when younger. Waiters get free food and drink, office workers look at FB and steal pens. Glen Beck shills for gold. Politicians can "fundraise." He just happened to have the ability to run background checks.

Wouldn't it be more prudent to just take 1 billion of those dollars and spend it looking for near earth asteroids.