Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Bugs and Security Holes (Score 1) 215

It's open source software. Bugs can be squashed, security holes can be closed. Over time with enough effort the project can mature. If it doesn't there will be forks that use parts of it that are good and grow from there. That's the way the community and projects work.

Or: "It's open source software. Bugs will be left open for years to implement new features nobody wants (Firefox), over time more and more fragmentation will come because of forks and nothing really works. Also, when a project is finished to the original developer (aka "it works"), the whole thing is abandoned.

That is also the way the community works.

Comment Re:Back in 2002. (Score 1) 867

Windows got better, so I haven't tried Linux since the early 2000's.

Linux has gotten better as well. I switched on the desktop late 2000 from Windows NT 4 to Slackware 7 (version number bumping is nothing new...). From there I have used Debian, Gentoo, LFS and now mainly Ubuntu on desktops and CentOS on servers.

Before 2000, I used Slackware, but just for servers.

Comment Re:Too little too late (Score 2) 175

The community doesn't want to see a significant switch to Linux. We will not be special anymore. We won't have magical computer skills anymore. And we'll have viruses.

I couldn't care less if nobody used Linux. *I* use it, because *I* like it. All this effort to get people to move to Linux is better spent on creating open protocols and formats, so *every* OS out there would just work.

Comment Could be a good idea, if and only if .... (Score 1) 550

there are also laws governing the quality of code.

The analogy of Microsoft is not so bad, considering that a door-maker, or a house builder actually has laws governing the *construction* of their products. Same thing goes with safety standards in the industry. This leads to provable checks on the design, *before* something bad happens. Then, if something bad happens, you can request the reports and if everything is OK there, the designer/engineer is not responsible, but it is an 'accident'.

If the computer industry can come up with design standards, the law can make these standards obligatory. Without these standards, this whole thing is bound to become yet-another-stupid-IT-legal-battle with lawyers and judges without a clue.

Comment LiteStep on Windows NT 4 (Score 1) 654

If any, it would be LiteStep. I came from a Linux background and started using Windows NT in 2000 for some months (internship for school) and couldn't live without a decent shell (multiple desktops, etc). I came across LiteStep and loved it.

If I would have to work on Windows full time, I'd probably have it installed now again (is it still alive?).

All others aren't nostalgia, as I still use them. And the real nostalgia, C64, isn't a GUI.

Comment Re:twisted pair, twisted logic (Score 1) 497

I was going to mod you insightful until that last phrase:

The smaller government, the poorer the people. The bigger the government, the richer the people.

The Soviet Union had a large (huge) government, and the people were not quite richer. A more current example would be Cuba.

I think the power lies in the balance: with great power (read: wealth) comes great responsibility.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any given program will expand to fill available memory.

Working...