So if I understand you correctly, your recommendation is that we let one company innovate and take risks, and let everyone else jump on board once it's been borne out in the market. The fact that Android devices have as big of a slice of the market-share pie indicates that this is exactly the situation that's occurred. Apple invested in R&D, took a risk with a dramatically unique product, and everybody else follows suit when it turns out to be a hit.
That kind of situation is the exact reason patents exist. To encourage risk-taking, encourage innovation, and allow individuals and companies to get a huge return on their investment through an artificial monopoly on the market when they come up with something novel.
Ahem...
Regardless of the particular patents Apple has chosen to fight with in these battles...
It's certainly not reasonable for Apple to sue any company that makes a device that merely looks similar. But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about Apple suing companies who have essentially copied their products and innovations wholesale.
Apple single-handedly made tablets and smartphones into the products you recognize today. Before Apple, we had products like this and this. Suddenly, post-iPhone, we have this and this.
I'm no fan of patents, but this is the exact sort of innovation the patent system was designed to protect in the first place. Regardless of the particular patents Apple has chosen to fight with in these battles, can't reasonable people agree that Apple ought to have some protection on their R&D investments?
Commuters from suburbs impose significant costs when they drive into the city. For instance, traffic planners have determined that the maginal cost of the average person deciding to drive into the Central Business District of Manhattan costs New York City residents $128.
What's absurd is the concept that people whose crappy, selfish lifestyle decisions impose insane costs upon others shouldn't have those costs brought to bear upon them instead. Rising gas prices have barely encouraged people to stop purchasing millions of miniaturized monster trucks — demand-based tolls to access highly-trafficked areas stands a better chance. And it offsets some of the costs back onto the people who impose them in the first place.
UV light != visible light. Go back to high school.
-1, Idiot
Visible light is a form of radiation. Heat is a form of radiation. Therefore light bulbs cause cancer, right?
What does GIT have over other version management systems? Easier to use? Easier to install?
Not irreparably broken.
To those who are unfamiliar, each commit in Git has a SHA1 hash which is used as an identifier instead of a revision numbers. Unfortunately, they are very unwieldy to communicate to others.
Oh come on. Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V is "unwieldy"?
I have used git exclusively now for over three years, and I completely forgot that incremental version numbers even used to exist. It's a bullshit non-issue..
What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance?