Just imagine if all the talented people who spent hundreds or thousands of man-hours making this remake instead spent their energy on something new.
If you'd bother to look, you'd know that AGDI has produced original pieces of work.
Surely having an interface consistent with 99.9% of the other applications running on your system is more useful than keeping up with the Jones's latest patent-encumbered different-for-the-sake-of-being-different UI fad?
As an Emacs user, I beg to differ.
Regardless of her political party, regardless of YOUR political party, we did not need this. We are all, on both sides of the aisle, diminished when this happens.
That's empty rhetoric. Moreover, it's simply not true. Someone is guilty. I'm not that someone. I am not diminished by this at all.
I grew up in a country where any tragedy of this kind (massacre, police injustice, etc) would result in everyone nodding their heads saying, "This is a collective shame for all of us!" Sorry, but no sir! I'm not ashamed of what I didn't do, or was not part of. Growing up there, I never saw this notion of false collectivism solve anything as a result of said collective shame.
yes, there are crazy people everywhere. but if you give the crazy person easy access to a gun,
Just as you can't absolve the owner of the gun company, the guy who sold the gun in the store, and the worker who actually was involved in building that gun. Let's not point fingers only to those we find convenient to blame.
And dude, linking to Daily Mail? Really?
Yes, you get a useless magazine.
Publishing a nonsensical paper in a useless magazine proves little.
He then came out later and revealed the hoax, embarrassing the reviewers and the journal.
What reviewers? The journal was not a peer reviewed journal. In other words, it was merely at the level of a magazine.
Almost every time the Sokal Affair comes up on the net, I have to correct someone on this point.
so if we start using CHEAPER electricity, are the economies hurt?
Let me know when you find the magic bottle with cheaper electricity.
if you believe that, you have idea what economics is, and so you should stop talking about the subject
Thanks for enlightening me.
it's just simple economics
Yes, but your simple economics will also greatly hurt both the US and the Canadian economy.
You're going off on a tangent. These regulations are in place not because KSA is a theocracy, but because it is a dictatorship.
Taking an example from a discipline and condemning the whole discipline for it is not intelligent. I mean, I could take some aspects of evolution and point at how biologists study them, and claim it is science - when compared to what most other disciplines do, the rigor is laughable.
Basically, there are two camps in psychology: Those who rigorously follow the scientific method, and those who loosely follow it. Declaring a whole discipline as not science would be like declaring biology not to be science.
College is a choice, if students decide to squander it, banning laptops won't fix it.
True, but laptops can break an education of a student who didn't intend to squander it - and I don't say that in jest. When I was in school, I know people who would have learned better had they simply not brought the laptop in. They didn't "decide" to squander it.
Nevertheless, banning them from the classroom is stupid.
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White
