What if he really never had stolen anything, and was just telling you stories in an attempt to get you kids to incriminate yourself? That would be pretty low, but I can imagine that a 30 year old stockboy working with kids half his age, any of whom he might be calling "boss" in another few years, might have just such a mindset.
I'm pretty sure every car sold in the US since the Yugo will last more than 15 years, unless you do something really stupid with it.
Yes, I'm sure that the experience of someone who knows how to "port the heads" (whatever that means) and "install a new camshaft" (whatever that means) is representative of the experience of the rest of us who just take our cars to the shop down the road when something starts clanking.
He used to have four paws. Now he has fore paws and faux paws.
I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. Can you simplify that a bit?
The raw material is still there after the methane is extracted. It's still good fertilizer.
So.... Can you sum that up in a couple of sentences for me?
Not really a blow to creation science. Don't get me wrong - I think evolution has more than enough science behind it to accept it as fact. But I also think it's good to try to really understand all sides of an argument. Just casually flipping through a creationism book will show that creationists don't have any problems with natural selection - which is what this is. It's the idea of evolution - one species turning into an entirely different species - that gets their panties in a bunch. Just using natural selection to make herbicide-resistant weeds isn't really any different than selecting certain traits to create new dog breeds. But that isn't evolution either.
Name me one major religion that does not have misogyny as a core principal
Name me one major porn producer that doesn't have misogyny as a core principle.
So long as there aren't any requirements that porn must use
They will be required. Not explicitly, but laws will be drafted that make porn sites liable for minors viewing their material unless it's through the
There weren't really any good anti-hacking laws on the books in 1988. The Internet wasn't really on the public radar, and Morris did a lot to change that. I remember this time well because I was 20 years old in 1988 and was doing a lot of the same things Morris was. For anyone who could read a Unix man page, Internet security back then was a complete joke. Every system from pretty much every vendor was trivially hackable from the second the coax was attached. The thing that Morris did that the rest of us didn't was hack together some shell scripts to automate the process.
Anyway, when the worm hit, there were a lot of questions over what he could be charged with. I think the whole "unauthorized access of a computing device" was drafted in response to that. At that time, My cohorts and I were on fairly good "friendly enemy" terms with the college sysadmins, and would dutifully notify them (i.e. brag) whenever we found a new exploit. However, starting right about the time the Morris worm hit, attitudes about our activity started changing rapidly. Laws were drafted, at the Federal and state level. There were mutters from higher up about "teaching those kids a lesson". The sysadmins didn't smile and wave anymore when we passed each other. Computers were starting to become important to "regular people".
Personally, I wised up, and found more creative uses for my talents. I also got my own sysadmin job, which changed my outlook regarding hacking greatly
Kernell was found guilty of computer fraud - a misdemeanor subject to a prison term of up to one year -- and obstruction of justice, which carries a maximum 20-year sentence.
Don't lie to the feds. They get all bent out of shape about that. Frankly, even if they were to question me about someone else's crime, I would give serious consideration to refusing to speak to them, out of concern that my version of events might not be the same as someone else's, and they might decide that I was the one "misremembering".
The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you.
And if I want to keep my mods private I will charge one million USD for the source. I am allowed to do this because I initially charged that much for initially distributing the binaries (to one of my shell companies, of course, which then redistributed to you). When I receive payment, the source will be mailed to you in leather-bound hardcopy, in 6pt dingbats font, and you will find that there is a 100,000 to 1 comment-to-code ratio. Enjoy your source distribution!
Why they don't require some kind of photo on a soc card is beyond me
Since we now get our social security cards when we're still infants, that would look a little funny.
The key is heating and pressurizing gasoline before injecting it into the combustion chamber, says Mike Rocke, Transonic's vice president of business development. This puts it into a supercritical state that allows for very fast and clean combustion, which in turn decreases the amount of fuel needed to propel a vehicle. The company also treats the gasoline with a catalyst that "activates" it, partially oxidizing it to enhance combustion.
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.
