What's interesting is that the more wealthy and powerful often then steer society right over a cliff. If they retreat into gated communities, keep their kids out of the public schools, eat different food, and shrug off environmental concerns where other people have to live (i.e. "Louisiana isn't the only place that has shrimp"), they're completely out of touch and not cognizant of real and serious problems, whether or not they were actually brighter or more gifted to begin with.
The current ruckus over the Keystone XL comes to mind when dyed-in-the-wool Republicans are suddenly realizing what it means to have a corner-cutting fossil fuel industry endangering the environment when by environment we're talking about where we live and work and farm and make a living. Suddenly they're with the environmentalists. It's great, but all of a sudden an issue is seen differently when it's close at hand. The onus is on creating more informed empathy, not on questioning the masses' right to have a voice in society.
There's a lot of criminality plainly in the history books about how wealth has been distributed. It has more to do with ruthlessness and privilege than with hard work in most cases. Once put into the mean side of that outcome, do you shove all the most polluting industries next to their homes, bid down wages until folks are working huge numbers of hours just to make ends meet with no time for deeper analysis of the world, turn the public schools into a joke, make the media discourse a non-stop sponsored infomercial, and then get to gripe with any legitimacy about how those folks can't vote right?
That's why, watching our country and this post, I can't help but think of how patricians mostly just had surreal, detached, useless conversations in their country villas when the Vandals sacked Rome.
Top-heavy societies just don't last.