well said

you're not going to stay employed long with that moronic level of hotheadedness friend

if i push you out a window that's not fair. but you can't take it back either just because it's not fair. you can and should prosecute me for pushing you out a window. but you can't magically snap your fingers and magically you never fell out a window. same if i divulged your private info publicly

Can you say how it is failing? Sure, the information is there

uhhh...

so people should be judged for stupid shit they did as teenagers and should be ashamed of that their entire life? out of fear of remaining employed by narrow minded douchebags? that's your vision of life? you're a weak piece of shit aren't you

but you are right: before the internet this info decayed. and? so what

welcome to a new age

technology changes things. life before nuclear power, the gun, the printing press: all very different

society was, is, and will be dramatically altered by new technology. i'm certain some nobleman somewhere started pouting it wasn't fair peasants were now reading and demanding something called "democracy" too. so we shouldn't adapt new technology?

things change. can't put the genie back in the bottle friend. adapt or die

however, i agree with you: i too think it's lame someone might be judged for stupid shit they did in high school 20 years later or for their sexuality. so i think we have the basis for an actually effective, moral law: prosecution of piece of shit bosses for moronic shallow employment decisions

but certainly not a dumb law like "we can magically make public info private in the age of the internet"

then you should stop hanging around douchebags and/ or stop telling private stuff to douchebags

for once that douchebag makes your private details public, it's public

i mean an asshole can throw you out a window too. that's wrong. but just because it's wrong doesn't mean you magically didn't get thrown out a window and magically didn't die. you can't take that back

likewise, information that has been made public, stays public. if it got public by nefarious means, so what? punish the nefarious piece of shit that made it public. you can't say "it's wrong it's not fair" and pout and then it magically becomes private again

exactly

it's just such a moronic and absurd concept, forced content delinking

I wouldn't want to work for a company who judged me for the stupid shit I did as a teenager or if I were a homosexual.

You are entitled to a private life, but if you make something public, it's public, period. No take backs. Not because I said so but because of the nature of public information.

There is no technological fix for that and Europeans, and yourself, have a deluded "solution" to a reality and a fact of life which is not actually a problem and does not go away, ever.

Own who you are, be ashamed of nothing, including your mistakes. Anyone who would bully you into submission with sensitive areas of your life is no one you should want to associate with and merely an announcement of your own insecurity and weakness.

why anyone thought forced delinking will ever work?

it just draws more attention to what you are trying to delink

it seems so absurd. i can't imagine a group of adults believing in or supporting such a ridiculous concept

i didn't click any of your links. i don't care what shithole you came from. i don't care about you. i care about your ignorant definition of freedom which is clearly wrong, because it is unfortunately rife throughout society and guides many morons' perceptions of right and wrong

your definition of freedom is immature, that of a teenager. no, that's infair to teenagers, as many do appreciate responsibility. but for someone like you, a cognitive immature child, freedom apparently only means some government sticking cattle prongs up your ass or whatever the fuck animates your cold war era fantasies

the simple truth is most impositions on freedom come from irresponsible people around you, those who do not care what they do and how it might limit your freedoms

true freedom is "i can do whatever i want, as long as i don't impinge on the freedom of others"

an immature douchebag thinks "i can do whatever i want, who cares who i hurt or what i damage"

the problem, the abuse that hurts actual freedom, is shitbags who go around constantly ranting about freedom, when their conception of freedom has absolutely nothing to do with actual freedom, and are really the rationalizations of immature children who either are

1. maliciously trying to avoid the consequences of their actions, or

2. are so fucking ignorant they don't understand their actions even have consequences

morons and malicious people are the ones who truly damage the respect for freedom, and they are always the ones whining about "freedom" when they are caught or asked to account for or pay for the consequences of their irresponsibility

take for example the douchebag who blasts his stereo at 3 AM. the guy next door calls the cops, and when they knock on his door, the douchebag is going to whine about tyranny and oppression from above, like you do

when in actuality the only imposition on true freedom, the freedom of the guy trying to get some sleep, is done by the immature douchebag who thinks he can do whatever he wants, who cares about the consequences, that that is "freedom"

this notion that government is only the threat to freedom is equally immature and ignorant. it can often if not mostly come from the immature teenagers like yourself in general society who constantly infringe on the freedom of others. it can also come from the government. but in a civil society with respect for freedom, the cops are usually protecting the rest of us from the freedom destroying losers like the guy who blasts his stereo at 3 AM, morons with a shallow ignorant understanding of what freedom is, like yourself

a sense of responsibility is the only way you arrive at a true mature understanding of what freedom is. if everyone were responsible, there would be no need for laws, or government

but unfortunately we need laws and government, to keep immature children like yourself who whine about tyranny and oppression because the cops told you you can't play your stereo at 3 AM

it is really quite simple: you don't know what freedom is. you are an immature child who whines and pouts because there are natural limits on what you can do in life: the freedoms of others around you

my eyes dimmed with skepticism then completely rolled over here

They can't make a faith-based or political comment on a web page.

why is it that you ignorant hysterical fucks just lie?

you have no idea what freedom is

really

you're an immature teenager

I should have added: I have 0 interest in paying for anybody else's service under the gun of a government thug.

good for you you fucking moron

i take it you don't drive since auto insurance is mandatory

the insurance is mandatory because the us government is a conspiracy to take away your freedom for laughs... i mean, avoiding the low iq paranoid schizophrenic mental diarrhea of braindead retards... it is that way because nobody likes a freeloading asshole who causes great damage and then can't pay the fucking bill

just like it is with health insurance you blind dumb mentally ill fuck

freeloading is not freedom

this is the absolute truth: you don't even understand what freedom is

you confuse it with irresponsibility. you are an immature shallow dimwit

the founding fathers were extremely skeptical of religion

you will remember (if you are educated) that much of the 1600s in europe were spent with catholics murdering protestants and protestants murdering catholics and many perturbations in between. because "it came from god" as you say meant different things to different violent bigots, and they were therefore entitled to murder those who did not believe as they did. much like the reason daesh (ISIS) gives for murdering shias today

most of the first europeans to come to these shores were in fact fleeing such religious persecution. which is not a cute word for "tut tutting and walking by sternly" but mass murder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

this is why the very first amendment, the establishment clause states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...

essentially, your thinking and your words are anathema to the foundation of this country

the historical lesson was very clear to the founding fathers of what you have when religion dictates government: mass murdering hell

btw, i mean it when i say the founding fathers were extremely skeptical of religion:

http://hwarmstrong.com/christi...

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2...

http://freethought.mbdojo.com/...

http://www.liberalamerica.org/...

If I break my arm, I will go to the hospital and pay for the service

i stopped reading there

do you understand the reality of the topic you are injecting your ignorance into?