Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The decision is fairly readable (Score 1) 17

Yeah, that's covered in the decision too. They claimed that they weren't a data controller; that their cookies were essential (nope); that their cookie didn't need separate disclosure (when you accept or reject advertising you are not informed that IAB is also holding your data). They were also sanctioned for not having a way to withdraw consent that is at least as easy as giving it.

They've been hit with a modest fine (as per the EU legislation which essentially says it needs to be big enough to dissuade just paying up as a cost of doing business); been told to delete all their current data held on customers because none of it was given with adequate consent; and told to rebuild their current system so that it does fully comply with GDPR.

That last one is the biggie, since I'm not sure it can be done without a complete redesign.

Comment The decision is fairly readable (Score 2) 17

I dipped into the decision linked in the description. It's quite readable. Until now, IAB Europe has maintained that it did not create any personal data. Err, it creates a persistent individual identifier for each user, with details about their preferences, which it (IAB) holds in a data store, and which it sends to all the bidders as part of the real-time bidding process.

I don't see how they are going to succeed in any claim that they are not a data controller, but hey, IANAL.

Comment Re:For spell checkers, the situation is even worse (Score 1) 128

The natural order would be "large, brown sofa". "That is a large, brown sofa".

If you said "The brown, large sofa", the statement would imply that there was another large sofa that was a different colour. In would be mentally parsed as brown (large sofa).

If you want to talk about the hateful, big, oblong, brown, french, leather fainting couch, references to the fainting, leather, french, brown, oblong, big, hateful couch are just going to feel wrong and confusing to a native English speaker.

Comment Re:I wish hardness is related to "strength" (Score 1) 155

I recommend The New Science of Strong Materials: Or Why You Don't Fall through the Floor by James Edward Gordon. "Strength" is a surprisingly poorly understood concept. Which is stronger, a bucket of sand or a rope? It depends on what you are doing with it: pulling or pushing. When you consider torsion as well, it becomes even more complicated.

As you point out, toughness (opposite of brittle) is often the most important thing. Stiffness (elasticity) is the other main concern. But then you add in "per kg" and it becomes even more interesting. Then, add in cost (of production and manufacture), isotropy, toxicity, temperature range, etc. and it becomes gloriously complicated

Gordon's book is a great read.

Comment Choices, choices (Score 4, Funny) 50

"Step right up, see the cage match of the century. Two fighters enter, only one leaves. Now, place your bets!"

"Can I choose neither please?"

"Not an option. Choose one! Make your choice!"

"Can I have my liver pecked out daily by an eagle instead?"

"That's going to happen regardless of which one wins. I repeat, place your bets..."

Comment Re:Live longer or live forever? (Score 1) 211

As I recall (badly), in one of Larry Niven's stories (from the Magic Goes Away series I think), there is a battle involving a wizard who is losing, very, very badly. It contains a line something like "<wizard> must have done something to prevent him from dying. He must have been regretting that very much about now."

Slashdot Top Deals

"The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel

Working...