I'm not familiar with the guy in question, and maybe he really is a nut, however...
That is actually the closest I have seen to a sensible response to this. Slashdot needs a way of marking stories "flamebait".
Follow the links throught to Robert Sungenis's site. He is a complete nut case. He is a creationist,
So am I. Although I suspect the actual story of creation is not entirely understood by christians and completely misunderstood by non-christians.
I don't understand antisemitism. There's a lot of christians (Mel Gibson comes to mind) who seem to hate jews, but claim to be followers of christ, who was a jew... I don't get it.
This one is politically charged. Are you claiming that anyone who suggests an alternate story to the official government story is somehow insane? What if the alternate story is right and the government is lying? Do you believe everything your government tells you? Anyone who has taken and understood physics 101 can see that something was seriously wrong with the official story of the building 7 collapse. And where's the plane wreckage in PA and at the pentagon? How does a 757 fit through a 16ft diameter hole and not leave the wings outside the building? I'm not sure what really happened on 9/11. But I'm convinced that the government story is a (laughably poor) lie.
Now the bit about how the moon landings were faked... I've examined their evidence. And what it looks like to me is that a lot of the photos were doctored, like a 70s version of photoshop, which is what I think they're latching on to. But I seriously doubt the landings were faked.
And JFK? Government lying.
It's our responsibility to not take "official stories" as fact without examining the evidence ourselves. Critical thinking is important and necessary.
The "news alert" links on the front page of one of his sites include one to a site that claims that the Vatican has been infiltrated by "satanic cults".
This is entirely possible. Do you have proof one way or the other? What if I told you that in the book of revelations in the bible, it describes a one-world religion that will be forced on everyone (including atheists) to go along with the one-world government, and the description for that one-world religion perfectly fits (what will likely be the remnants of) the roman catholic church? Is this really that impossible? The pope already seems to be abandoning some christian values while embracing ecumenism. And if pedophiles can get into the church, why not satanists? Maybe the word "satanist" is too sensational and it's really something more subtle. There seems to be a lot of "luciferian" religious teaching around these days disguised as the new age movement or "many ways to get to God". Maybe this is what he's talking about?
Why is this even worth discussing?
Because some of it may actually be true, and because we're not sheep?