Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:They haven't challenged anyone (Score 1) 226

uhhh, Apple TV has been out for many years and works fine with non-apple wifi and non apple computers. It does require iTunes, but last I heard iTunes was software, not hardware.

There's no reason to assume the new Apple TV won't work the same way, just without the streaming of video from whatever computer iTunes is on.

Comment Re:Just because it's patented... (Score 1) 381

Okay so you lead the cops to the address of the guy that has 'your' phone.

They confiscate the phone (if it is still there) and it is now evidence in a case. It sits in the police evidence room for 6 months or more awaiting a court date...you really don't gain anything from the whole procedure, except maybe getting the privilege of spending a significant amount of time on the whole process.

The police barely have enough time to find lo-jacked cars, never mind $200 cell phones...

Comment Re:Faster than a speeding (Score 1) 217

Demand for rentals is THROUGH THE ROOF right now due to the downturn

Not it's not - in most places anyways. There was just a thing on npr about this - lots of people are moving back with parents or renting a room in a house, as opposed to getting their own apartment. There is a rental glut due to inmvestors buying houses cheap and renting them out.

I have a rental and am not looking forward to finding new renters when my current renters leave in a few months.

Comment Re:Like how in the 80's Prince was hip... (Score 1) 450

Actually the Ferraris from the early 80s aren't particularly highly valued, neither are the Porsches from that era - they generally are underpowered due to the perception of a gas shortage at that time.

One would do well with a mid to late 70's ferrari - still carbeurated and significantly more powerful than an 80-85.

Comment Re:Oh come on man think! (Score 1) 393

the energy imparted to an object by wind is basically area x density of air x speed.

given a constant wind speed and density you find you need a specific area 'A' to propel a mass forward.

You then double the area 'A' - what happens to all the extra energy you are inputting into the system? All you need to do is find a way to use this extra energy for forward propulsion and you will find a way to go faster than the wind, which apparently these guys have done, contrary to the supposed impossibility of it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Confound these ancestors.... They've stolen our best ideas!" - Ben Jonson

Working...