I just read through the patent and I can't make head or tail of what exactly is being patented. The best I can tell is some sort of system that has multiple identities that it shows to different people depending on your relationship.
And if it's difficult to tell what is being patented should it really be patented?
Claim language can be confusing, as the need for repeating terms makes reading a claim very clunky. The specification (written description) is always secondary to claim language when you're talking about what is covered by the patent. It's useful for claim interpretation and defining scope, but the claims are the name of the game. Here's the first independent claim of the Google patent:
1. A computer-implemented method for generating a plurality of personas for an account of a first user of a social network performed on one or more computing devices, the method comprising: receiving, using the one or more computing devices, information for the plurality of personas from the first user, wherein the information comprises a name, a representation, and a visibility level for each persona in the plurality of personas; associating the information for the plurality of personas to the account of the first user; associating a particular persona of the plurality of personas with a second user on the social network, the second user being distinct from the first user; receiving a selection of one of the plurality of personas from the first user; determining, using the one or more computing devices, an appearance of the selected persona based at least in part on the visibility level and representation of the selected persona; and providing the determined appearance for display.
Based on a quick read, its a method for generating different profiles based on the user account preferences and that user's relationship with another user viewing the profile. The very earliest possible priority date on this is 2010: "This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/219,398 filed Aug. 26, 2011 and entitled "Social Computing Personas for Protecting Identity in Online Social Interactions," which claims priority under 35 U.S.C.
I have absolutely no idea, even after reading through some of the file history, how they got around privacy settings/public vs. private profile features, which have been around for quite some time.
What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards committee.