With [hosting from home], did you install:
No I did not. Because what I host doesn't require that degree of uptime and physical security. I listed many options that may or may not be appropriate to the original poster. The OP didn't make clear what his hosting needs were, so my suggestions were a bit of a shotgun approach.
Obviously there are things that hosting in a real data center can do that one can't do at home. You just need to figure out what your needs and your resources are.
If you have some reason that you haven't moved to a different provider, at least let the rest of us know who to avoid. Name and shame, please.
As others have pointed out
Mi van?
Oh well. I always get "még" and "mar" confused. I was trying to say, "It already is", but I guess I got it wrong.
I think it's all a secret ploy to make Hungarian the default world language
Meg is van.
I'm unable to understand the main post (too much legal and technical jargon for my largely forgotten Hungarian knowledge), but I can read many of the comments.
Someone specifically asked about docx and a comment reply said that docx would be allowed because of the ISO decision (in which Hungary supported making docx an ISO standard). Both the query and response were from ACs, but the response certainly seems plausible to me.
The story of Hungary's ultimate support for Microsoft in the ISO is a long and twisted tale which I was only able to partially follow.
I've tried to take a look at it, but my ability to read Hungarian, particular legal documents, is limited.
What isn't clear to me is would this rule out MS-Word documents for government communication? What about PDFs?
Translation of the poll into actual english:
"Where do I live?"
I've sampled pizza on three of the continents mentioned, but as it turns out I think the best pizza I've had was in New Haven, Connecticut. That is also happens to be on the continent where I currently reside (though I'm far from New Haven).
Dude, all of your traffic are passing through your ISP already, what makes you think they won't log your DNS requests to Google if they found enough people are using it?
There is a big difference between keeping logs for a service you are running and doing deep packet inspection. And if our ISPs are doing that, then Google is the least of our worries with respect to privacy.
Google is datamining everywhere and everything already.
When I first read about this, I immediately thought about datamining. But after another second, I figured that I would prefer Google to have this information than Verizon (where my caching DNS server currently forwards to). It is true that Google is better at datamining, but do keep in mind that whoever is providing your DNS service has the information about your DNS requests.
Another difference between Google and your ISP is that your ISP knows who you are from your IP address. So they can link DNS resolution requests to specific, named, customers. Google can't do that directly.
Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the pens will multiply instead of disappear.