in your opinion how the kernel development get easy to learn for newbie.

how will you ensure the running and development of your kernel project after you and how you will increase the no of kernel developers.

will you take initiative into desktop to make it successful in this area or still prefer the natural ecosystem?

i don't know much about this but want just for my education that is it possible to shrink your kernel and make it smaller and smaller while keeping it monolithic.

Why don't you invest your money and take initiative in GNU hardware for desktop, graphic card and hardware and break the monopoly in this area too. I don't want a reply of consulting RMS for that. I need a serious initiative reply.

Is it rechargable and having high cycles of charge/discharge just like Li-ion bat?

it is like throwing flower or spreading perfume. whats bad in that. data is intact and now secure, virus free and better system

Just like freedom of expression, there need to be freedom of religious rights too.

DMCA is Defective by Design. join http://www.defectivebydesign.org/

this is just showoff - why dont gates make ms opensource and merge to gnu

no - as anyone cannot become poet.

Beginner should use forums and search engine while advance users shall reporting bugs at bugs.debian.org and self research, wait for next release and self compiling. I had battery icon display problem (resolved my self), clamped polygon display problem (not resolved), session restore after suspend in gnome shell (not resolved), low fps in glxgears (resolved), no desktop environment after fresh installation in debain (resolved), out dated packages in debian cut (not resolved) and license issues of canonical for unity (resolved after shifting to debian).I want to make linux the system of choice for engineers. I found and compiled many engineering packages for cad, gis, project planning, and cae. There are many preloaded cae and gis distro but I want engineering packages right on debian main sources to be part of great community.

Beginner should use forums and search engine while advance users shall reporting bugs at bugs.debian.org and self research, wait for next release and self compiling. I had battery icon display problem (resolved my self), clamped polygon display problem (not resolved), session restore after suspend in gnome shell (not resolved), low fps in glxgears (resolved), no desktop environment after fresh installation in debain (resolved), out dated packages in debian cut (not resolved) and license issues of canonical for unity (resolved after shifting to debian).I want to make linux the system of choice for engineers. I found and compiled many engineering packages for cad, gis, project planning, and cae. There are many preloaded cae and gis distro but I want engineering packages right on debian main sources to be part of great community.

In pdf research paper file: 1. Isn't this a stereotypical jump towards conclusion of this paper? Is N = 1377 and then 1145 enough? Why didn't he mentioned the sample size in his abstract? 2. Why there is no graph or table? 3. Are not the believes of "no link of CO2 to climate" and other subject hold some truth behind? 4. Why the weak researcher cannot prove their point in simple words to public just like all we believe and understand and see the moon, sun, days and nights? 5. Is the idea of free-market economics not part of science, are there no observations and scientific facts on the other part. Are all variables covered and counted that resulted in linking climatic change to CO2 emission. 6. As per stereotypical view adopted in this paper, i cannot find any link between scientific believes and the topic name ' Motivated rejection of science' 7. Isn't this paper like a = b, and b = c hence x = y By answering these points this paper can prove its self.

It IS customized mint desktop.