Spot images that I'm referring to are by the surgeon, being used to get a trajectory for a screw for instance, and typically they are not shielded, 'cause I have to hold the drill while looking at the x-ray.

This will be good for doing angios, etc, where they just stand around and watch - which is good, 'cause they just hit the fluoro pedal, and the radiation stream is constant. For stuff like orthopaedics (my specialty), we usually just use spot images, and have to move around a lot, twist the patients legs, reduce fractures, etc, This suit is way too bulky, and wont be useful

Not a bad idea - I can see it getting used.
"zero G" - now that just makes me laugh

So get more than one light bulb per room and use the next when the first runs out.

ok please show me any scientific body of evidence that supports that vaccines cause autoimmune diseases.
I don't think you'll find any reputable sources. A vaccine is merely supplying your immune system with an antigen to provide immunity in the future. By your logic, any immune response, from anyting, might cause autoimmune diseases. You sound like you like Jenny McCarthys idiotic rantings.

This article backs up my point of view.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/111/3/653

Typically when people state "it is well known" about anything, it's that they have no citations for their point of view.

at what point do we bother to call/diagnose people as having Autism/Aspergers? - Clearly up for debate, and the pendulum tends to swing one way, and then back another way.
In the end, Diagnosing someone with autism/Aspergers only does someone good, if it allows treatment that can improve their lives. Helicopter parents wanting a "diagnosis" on their poorly performing kid in school will eventually stop trying to label their kid as having this.

I think you'll find a much higher viewership than sports. When I was at the N.I.H. , pretty much every research guy I knew liked the Stooges, and also had Far Side cartoons on their door.
  I finished my stint at the NIH a while ago, and am a surgeon at a major academic institution. Pretty much every guy I know in my field practices some form of religion - this was also true at NIH as well. We were all somewhat quiet about it as well.

Anecdotal -yes, but I find that sometimes the atheists, in science, exhibit a belittling attitude, which the people who believed did not. That may be the reason why people were quiet about their faith, as well as there was not much of a reason to bring it up at work.

The temperature of objects produces (from what i recall of physics) black body radiation - meaning it produces light wavelengths. Just because we associate melted iron being red hot, doesn't mean other metals melt when they start to glow. It just means they are hot enough to produce enough black body radiation that we can see. Look at mercury for example as an opposite.

Cooking adds flavor to meat -that's one of the main reasons why things are cooked. Uncooked meat has around 200 flavor compounds, while cooked meat has over 1000.
  Now if texture/moisture is your primary concern, then yes rare to medium rare (140 deg F) is the way to go. Some people like their steaks not so wet, and with more flavor, and thus the medium to well done category.

There's something for everyone - just because you like it that way, doesn't mean it's the best way.

That's the blood you are tasting, more specifically the hemoglobin.

I briefly checked out all four parts of it, and nothing there references anything about anti-vehicular weapons vs people.
If you car to provide a link, I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
To be honest, I don't see how they would be prohibited, when bombs can be used.

Well the rates for malpractice insurance can be pretty high. Neuro surgeons in NYC probably pay around $100k EACH YEAR. And so who do you think gets those costs passed along.

And I paid for two years of it with my own earnings and help from my family.

repaying loans isn't that much of a factor
Now torte reform - that would bring about some cost savings.

As all ins co. have "deals" with hospitals. If you look at the bill, then you'll see that the ins co only pays a fraction of the charge. Indeed - most doctors only collect about 21-22% of what they bill.
80% off
that's right.

Except I don't know when. I could celebrate i^2 day, but then it would always be yesterday , and I'd miss it.