Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Legitimacy? (Score 1) 401

Its about time someone pisses on Quebec. Only seems fair when Quebec pisses on the rest of Canada every single day. Take your whining and separate already. And at the same time, we will save our billions of dollars the RoC uses to prop up your failed state. And don't forget to take 40% of the debt with you either.

Not every single judge appointed to the Court has to be bilingual. How about allowing deserving judges west of the Ottawa Valley a chance at the higher court?

Comment Re:More disturbingly... (Score 1) 401

Wow you have no idea what you are talking about.

Sure, and under Liberal rule the country ran well. Under Conservative rule it went downhill very quickly: education, health care, prisons, foreign affairs, defense - all these have been chipped away by either federal or provincial conservatives and the damage never undone.

One quick example: when I went to school in the 70s high school had grade thirteen, which was optional but was, in a sense, like first year college, but free.

Education - provincial
Health Care - provincial

The elimination of OAC brought Ontario's system of education inline with the rest of the continent. The elimination of OAC was a recommendation of a Royal Commission initiated by the provincial NDP government in 1995.

Military - Really, the military was better off under the Liberals? You must hate the military. Who was in power during the "decade of darkness"? That's right, Liberals. Who sent the troops to Afghanistan (a desert), in green cadpat? Liberals. Who bought for used submarines that ended up costing a sailor his life? Liberals.

Comment Re:Torqued Headline? (Score 1) 401

That's not true. Just because you are in the senate, doesn't mean you are shielded from investigation or prosecution.

I assume you are referring to the "in & out" scandal? If so, I am not sure flagrant is the right word. If I remember correctly, the Conservatives won their court case to only lose on appeal. If you lose on appeal, I don't think flagrant is the right word to describe your actions :)

Comment Re:Torqued Headline? (Score 1) 401

hah!

If it was funded by the Conservative Party of Canada, then it will be shown very easily. Why don't you post your libel under your real name and address?

Note, if the Conservative Party of Canada was behind this, I will be at the rallies asking for their resignation. But we are not there yet.

Comment Re:Not so fast there... (Score 1) 401

I don't need to watch it. I know that the Native's were wronged in many ways. I know my Canadian history. I don't believe that 80 million natives were killed.

Nor, do I feel any shame or guilt in the mis-treatment of natives. That happen decades and centuries ago. Ie, long before my time. We are not the same country or world now as we were back then.

I feel the billions they get every year, and the massive special treatment under the laws more then makes up for any mistreatment in the past.

Comment Torqued Headline? (Score 3, Insightful) 401

The headline is seriously torqued, bordering on libel.

The Conservative Party of Canada hasn't be proven to have committed any crime.

The robocaller company (RackNine), is "Conservative" connected by virtue of having Conservative Party of Canada as a customer and I guess being based in the west.

The facts haven't come out yet, so we shouldn't throw stones.

It is plausible that the robo calls were done by one or two people. Canada is a bilingual country, no voice actor is required.

It seems highly unlikely that this was funded and organized by the Conservative party of Canada as an official part of their strategy.

Comment Re:Is this Wikileaks day? (Score 1) 810

Everyone preaching that security through obscurity doesn't work needs to be quiet and let the adults speak!

Of course, security through obscurity (alone) doesn't work. It is layer of the security onion. The more layers, the more security. Yes, governments that secure a facility through keeping it hidden without real security backing it up is stupid.

A government that sticks something in the middle of something completely nondescript, that once you get in the doors has armed guards, time vaults, security cameras, dogs, and have/know security doors is much more secure.

Remember, not every terrorist (domestic or international) is a misunderstood genius avenging the wrongful death of his sweet and loving mother. They don't know, nor know how to find out where security facilities are. And when they do try and find out by asking people they get caught.

By keeping secrets secret, you help to lessen the attack vector by ensuring that armed morons cannot read about it on the internet and drive their pickup trucks through the gates, killing people in their failed attempt.

So repeat after me, security through obscurity is important, but is not everything.

kthxbye.

Comment Re:first! (Score 1) 1425

Wait what, Canada as an example for what?

1/ We have a Conservative government that gutted Federal spending room and wants to downsize government except for the military.
2/ We have some of the lowest corporate income taxes around

What makes us socialist? Health Care? And you want to make health care a centre piece? With Obama in the White House, and the new health care bill, where AM I SUPPOSED to go for good health care now??

Canada isn't socialist, and universal health care as run in Canada is not sustainable.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc

Working...