Submission + - Amazon v North Carolina? (theregister.co.uk)
Sales records are one thing, says Amazon. "But the DOR has no business seeking to uncover the identity of Amazon's customers who purchased expressive content, which makes up the majority of the nearly 50 million products sold to North Carolina residents during the audit period, let alone associating customers' names and addresses with the specific books, music, and video content that they have purchased during the past seven years."
While I can understand the state wanting to know how much its citizens spend with Amazon (for sales tax purposes), I can't see any legitimate reason for the state to know exactly what books and videos its citizens bought.