No, because someone sending a text may not notice being jammed but when the text fails, the sender will end up looking at his phone to try to send again.

Studies have shown that the following things are unsafe:

• laser pointers
• smoking cigarettes
• eating beef
• eating saturated fats
• eating transfats
• drinking caffeine
• sex without a condom unless in a monogamous relationship
• drinking alcohol
• riding motorcycles
• riding bicycles without a helmet
• using swimming pools
• driving while tired
• eating a diet high in sodium
• eating a diet high in sugar
• drinking sugary drinks

Government has failed to act to address these safety issues.

But, sacdelta, you did have a comment when a government tried to act to address one of these safety issues:

You mean like when someone jams your call?

Oh, so one can break the law and endanger others as long as one is doing it so one feels safer? You make me feel endangered, so I am going to kill you and that is OK because it will make me feel safer.

Please post your evidence that this:
A) "Definitely stopped several talking and driving accidents"
B) didn't cause any accidents due to people being distracted by the dropped call.
C) didn't cause any injuries or deaths when his jamming "interfered with first-responder communications"

While you are at it, exactly how many times a month do you drive I4 in the Tampa area?

I would get notifications of mod down weeks after I would post something. At one point, I thought it might be a group of people. Really, I should probably change that tag line. It doesn't happen often anymore. I figure the culprit(s) either found lives, got jobs, or realized how pathetic that kind of censorship is.

A jury of ignorant, frighten people award money to an ignorant, frightened sick family from a corporation doing something the jury doesn't understand with chemicals the jury has never heard of and have no idea what kind of side effects might occur from exposure.

Your post is complete and utter bullshit. It isn't about effectiveness, it is about pay and prestige. It is about women not wanting to do shit jobs but reap the benefits of those that do. Want a job at the top? Great, work you way up. Oh, you didn't make it? Neither did 90% of the rest of the people. Oh, and if you don't start "at the bottom with rubbish collectors", then you can't " come up through the ranks to reach the top levels", you fucking hypocrite.

Awww, look, members of anonymous don't like the truth. What's it like being the digital equivalent of the KKK?

More and more, Anonymous is looking like a bunch of reactionary vigilante thugs out to lynch anyone they consider to be in the wrong.

Would you be willing to drive to Joe's 3D printing service, LLC ?

Are you insane? Shop class means little Johnnie will be around big, dangerous machines and he might get hurt. And, if Johnnie gets hurt, his mommy and daddy are going to sue the school district!

Let me answer for Bennett:

Twit? Is that a nice way of saying he is an over-entitled, piece of shit whiner with delusions of grandeur that are being fed by the likes of Slashdot editors who keep letting him use Slashdot as her personal blog? If so, it is a much nicer way of saying what I think.

Yet another article by Bennett Haselton whining about how he can't do what he wants to do with other people's IP. Boo-fucking-hoo, Bennet. Stop being an over-entitled piece of shit and get a real life, you asshole.