Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Profit (Score 4, Interesting) 222

While the corporations that use our data have profited much, so have users. I certainly have profited *hugely* from Google's free search engine, free email, free Docs service, free apps on iPhone and Android, etc. I guess some people also consider that they've profited from whatever benefits Facebook and Twitter offer as well.

The real problem is that the information that these companies accumulate can be captured by the government, and that the logs may go back years (or forever)...

Comment Miranda (Score 2) 671

Anything you do on a computer which doesn't belong to you may be used against you in a court of law.

Carry a live-VD, buy a tablet, or use any other means to do your personal computing. Never use someone else's computer to log into your email accounts, surf, etc. And if you think you have "nothing to hide" and can't even imagine how it could be used against you, then you *definitely* need to heed this advice.

Comment Consent (Score 4, Insightful) 221

The only question should be: "Were the patients fully informed?" If I have a terminal or otherwise untreatable condition, I want to be able to decide for myself whether or not an unproven treatment is worth the risk.

Some people need "protection" or "hand-holding"? No problem. Protect them. But I also want the right to opt out of the government's protection.

Comment Pardon is the wrong word anyway (Score 2) 728

A pardon means "we forgive you for your offense".
It would be better for us to say "This law was wrong and the conviction was illegitimate." The only people who should be asking for a pardon are those who voted for and upheld that law.

Comment Policy (Score 2) 728

The current policy is wrong headed and contributes to current and continuing injury.
This policy must be changed such that convictions based on any crime that is now considered "cruel and absurd" must be overturned.

Comment Only open source can be secure (Score 3, Insightful) 582

The only way to be reasonably sure of security is by using open source encryption (TrueCrypt, PGP). If you're only using a "black box" system to protect your information, you should expect that governments (and crime syndicates who can bribe individual government employees) will have access to your information.

What's surprising is that anyone with secrets worth protecting doesn't already know this, or hasn't already hired someone competent enough to tell them this.

Comment Re:Should X be mandatory? (Score 1) 861

Our landfills are not in any way "filling up quickly" or "running out".

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/the_green_lantern/2011/02/go_west_garbage_can.single.html :
"Analysts from the Environmental Protection Agency and the landfill industry assure us that, despite having fewer landfills, total capacity has increased. That is, landfills are getting bigger, on average, faster than their brethren have disappeared."

Where this myth started:
http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/01/13/freakonomics-radio-the-economics-of-trash/

Slashdot Top Deals

How many NASA managers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? "That's a known problem... don't worry about it."

Working...