Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Apologies to Banjo Paterson (Score 5, Funny) 339

Once a jolly swagman plugged into the internets,
Under the shade of a coolibah tree,
And he sang as he watched and waited as he torrented
"Don't go deploying your filters on me".

"Deploying your filters, deploying your filters
Don't go deploying your filters on me"
And he sang as he watched and waited as he torrented,
"Don't go deploying your filters on me".

Down came the content speeding through the internets,
Up jumped the swagman and viewed it with glee,
And he sang as he shoved that content on his backup disk,
"You'll be a-wasting your filters on me".

"Wasting your filters, wasting your filters
Don't go a-wasting your filters on me"
And he sang as he shoved that content on his backup disk,
"Don't go a-wasting your filters on me".

Up rode the Conroy, mounted on his ISP,
Down came the troopers, one, two, three,
"Where's that jolly content you downloaded so illicitly?
You've been evading the filters from me."

"Evading the filters, evading the filters
You've been evading the filters from me."
"Where's that jolly content you downloaded so illicitly?
You've been evading the filters from me."

Up jumped the swagman and handed them his backup disk,
"You'll never crack my encryption", said he,
And his packets are tunneled and proxied through the internets,
"You'll never get your bloody filters on me".

"Your bloody filters, your bloody filters
You'll never get your bloody filters on me".
And his packets are tunneled and proxied through the internets,
"You'll never get your bloody filters on me".

Comment Re:Closed Source Cat (Score 1) 674

That's a nifty analogy, even if it mentions motor vehicles a total of 0x0000 times.

If I may extend it, let us place a vial in the box containing a deadly virus, and rig a thingy to break the vial at the moment some random script kiddie hits both shift keys simultaneously. In the closed-box model one has no way of knowing if the kitten is intact without opening the box. Just as the computer user has no knowledge of the integrity of the OS, applications and data without full visibility -- the box represents the vendor's level of disclosure. An open box very neatly circumvents the problem.

Man, it's getting late.

Comment Re:he did it on my dime (Score 4, Informative) 337

Kwitcherbitchin.

Nevada's got you beat six ways till Sunday. Utah and Oregon are not too far behind, and Idaho and Arizona are roughly 50 percent federally controlled on the basis of land area: Map plus top/bottom ten lists.

What's more to the point is the fact the federal ownership does not necessarily exclude economic exploitation. A significant portion of federal lands in AK are wide open to oil and gas production, coal and hardrock mining (the latter in the form of legalized looting thanks the the 1872 Mining Act), timber (hello Tongass NF) and dozens of other industries.

You've got a plethora of natural resources and lots of grubby opportunists who'd love an anarchic free-for-all to get while the gettin's good and say the fuck with the long-term consequences. Not too different from the placer miners in 1850s California, the sodbusters in the 1880s/1920s Great Plains, the real estate scammers and S&L kingpins of the 1980s, and myriad other shining examples of unfettered American enterprise. Thanks, but I'd rather see a steady hand on the controls even if some of y'all think it's a dead one.
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft launches tech lobbying site (voicesforinnovation.org)

mudshark writes: Microsoft has unveiled its new lobbying effort, Voices for Innovation, and is encouraging its partners to sign up and weigh in. The site's mission statement comes across as a call to arms for the tech sector, with the bullet points "Choice," "Innovation," and "Economic Development" under the subject heading "What's at Stake." It encourages visitors to sign up, sign an OOXML adoption petition, and take a quick poll. The rhetorical positioning of the issues is interesting, particularly this gem: "Mandating specific standards and licensing models and limiting how users control their digital privacy hurt the technology sector, consumers, and private and public sector technology users." I couldn't answer the first poll question, partly because they didn't list any of my principal tech news sources and partly because I don't know what a newspapser is.
Microsoft

Submission + - Standards NZ votes against ISO adoption of OOXML (standards.co.nz)

mudshark writes: Despite a last-minute media carpet-bombing effort from Microsoft featuring quarter-page display ads in the major dailies, coupled with significant astroturf pressure from MS partners, Standards NZ has cast a vote of "no with comments" on the ISO/IEC proposal for adoption of Office Open XML as an international standard. This decision leaves the door open for changing to a "yes" vote in February 2008 if numerous technical considerations are addressed — including the possibility of merging OOXML with the existing standard Open Document Format. As the Tui ads seen across the country would say: "Let's merge OOXML with ODF. Yeah, right."

Slashdot Top Deals

"Marriage is low down, but you spend the rest of your life paying for it." -- Baskins

Working...