Just curious, who is doing these studies and not funded by Monsanto?

Studies cost a lot of money, and usually no one but the manufacturer is willing to shell out for them. Which is why we spent decades being told that cigarettes aren't bad for you (nay, they're actually good for you!), and still get medicines that aren't pulled off the market until years after the manufacturer-funded studies show that they are harmful.

I don't know what the track record w.r.t. scams is so far, but it's just a matter of time until the con artists start trying to take the money and run.

Where there's money, there's crooks.

Wouldn't that violate the laws of conservation of matter and energy?

News at 11.

After the fact it was discovered that they had lots of clues. The problem is how to link them together when you've got so much in your files.

It's waiting for you to get on it.

When people ask whether I would cut my hair for a job I tell them "maybe so, but I wouldn't want to work for anyone who asked me to".

The article is, after all, about image.

Then there's the talking heads on the Sunday television shows, who can be wrong as often as they please and not suffer the slightest risk of losing their jobs.

Or the investment advisors. IIRC someone tracked Cramer's buy/sell advice for a year and found that he had a 49% track record - you would have done slightly better by flipping a coin.

Those deep field photos always give me vertigo.

Adding a new meaning to the term "security theater"...

Are you serious? One of their agents saw that they had the intention!

Atheism is a belief *about* religion, but that doesn't make it a religion.

I also have beliefs about planets, but those beliefs aren't planets...

Are they providing a sensible version of GNOME? I very want to shuck Ubuntu, and this would let me have my Steam games *and* a usable desktop system.

(I know there are GNOME alternatives, but I'm hoping for the easy way out.)

Let's see, you ask me what kind of Ferrari I drive, I say 'none', and you say that's a kind of Ferrari.

And you express that idiotic view with a glaring logical fallacy: If religion is a collection of beliefs, it does not follow that every collection of beliefs is a religion.

Hope you were just out for a troll...