Comment Re:Nice leading question (Score 1) 446
No. They'll still bomb their own marketplaces, weddings, funerals, anywhere with a crowd even with no military presence.
No. They'll still bomb their own marketplaces, weddings, funerals, anywhere with a crowd even with no military presence.
My daughter started playing WoW at about 2-and-a-half. She was fascinated with going in doors and up/down stairs in it. I was surprised how long it took her to perceive moving around in a 3D game. It starts with her just spinning non-stop, but before long (about 15 minutes) she had the key timings down to do just what she wants.
Sure, WoW's not Linux-specific, but start with something that's open-world with no pressure to do anything (Minecraft maybe?) but plenty of stuff to explore. Then, let them go at it on their own.
The same thing is going on here. "News" agencies see a story they like, and so they run with it without checking. Every election cycle it happens, and will continue to happen forever. No one is unbiased, Fox, Politico, TV networks.
Amazon recently opened it up to five European countries. So I guess you can finally use it if you wanted to return to stock...
And Ting is great for those areas that aren't multi-million populations. I'm dropping from $150/month for two Sprint lines to about $20-50 depending on usage. My area, 100-150k, has WiMAX in two spots around sprint stores (1500 Mbps tops). Real useful, right?
When I called Sprint to cancel, they promised LTE will be everywhere, not just major cities. I'll believe it when I see it. Meanwhile, I'll save a hundred a month.
It is definitely something to look into when you figure out how much you "need" mobile data. It is only a modest adjustment to download big things on home/work wifi (podcasts, custom ROMs, etc). Since I got a Nexus 7, I use my phone even less. So with Ting, I just turn tethering on this simple phone (LG Optimus Elite).
You have games you've downloaded on your drive, but what of those that you don't currently have downloaded, when Steam/XBox Live/etc one day close up? They're just as gone.
If you live your life constantly afraid of the apocalypse, you'll never enjoy yourself. Sit back, buy a game on OnLive at a heavy discount during their sales, play the shit out of it, have fun, and move on. The service hasn't gone down, it works just the same.
Or are you so smug you'd rather sit and stare at Slashdot for 2+ years going, "Yeah, one day I'll show them OnLive bastards when they go under!" while we've been having fun playing video games? Really? Is that a life you want to live?
It all depends on your gaming situation. If top-notch graphics are your primary concern, yes, OnLive sucks. Multiplayer for most games sucks since it tends to just be amongst other OnLive players so there's a smaller number of them.
Or, if you are a cheap-ass like me, it's great. They have had numerous sales that rival Steam's. 75% off coupons a multitude of times, for any one game on the service. Where can you catch a game a week or so out from release at 75% off? Also, I pre-ordered Saints Row 3 on OnLive for $17.49, which I hadn't seen beat on Steam until their summer sale.
I have a computer that can play most games on Ultra settings. I also have a laptop that cannot. I also have the microconsole (gotten for free with another game purchase) for the big-screen TV. It even works on my old-ass EeePC. I can play the same game on any and switch between them easily.
For me, OnLive has been wonderful to try out games (30 minutes free time for most games, not some crippled demo), or for games I'm not really sure are worth the $50-60 they want for PC/Console.
Latency hasn't been an issue for the last year. When the service first came out, there was about a half-second delay between when you moved the mouse and when you saw it move on the screen. That was fixed and games play far, far better. OnLive isn't going to replace all gaming everywhere (what is it with Slashdotters that every tech must wipe out everything else??), but it is a fine service when you put these factors in perspective.
And how much do they make on iOS? $0. That's his goal in this article.
From this guy's blog, "My name is Matt Gemmell, and Iâ(TM)m an iOS (iPad, iPhone and iPod touch) and Mac OS X (Cocoa) developer"
So, the headline needs to be changed. He knows Apple. He likes Apple's way of doing things. Android isn't doing things like Apple. Therefore, Android is teh suxx.
That's the problem, Battlefield 3 didn't do THAT well, compared to Call of Duty. They even cut the price of BF3 heavily right around release. I picked it up on sale, pre-order a week before release, for $35, including one bit of DLC. It did fine numbers, but not well enough that they could get away with this price increase.
This goes well with the recent Origin PHB saying Steam's sales cheapen the whole industry. I guess selling 10,000 at $70 is better than selling a million at $40, since the devs put so much hard work into it and you don't want to cheapen their work...
What is this ID number stuff and can I sign up for one?
I don't get it...
*bada*bing!
You must be new here. I've been around long enough to know the editors don't do anything but copy a story a user submits. Occasionally, they'll fix a typo, but that's about it.
Or just do a look 'round the interwebs yourself. The story is it's price drop from $500 to ~$200. Walmart, Best Buy, a couple other retailers all have the playbook at that price range.
So it's bigger than one seller on eBay if you'd look around...
According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.