Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones

Keeping in Contact With Family, From Afghanistan? 176

LiNKz writes "Within a short while I will be heading to Afghanistan and in the interest of keeping in communication with my wife and family I've been looking at different means of it, from VoIP to cellular services. I'm not sure how well connected or how stable of a connection the base I'm deploying to has, which means VoIP might simply not be an option. I have, however, noticed in my searches that Afghanistan has recently boomed with cellular coverage though that too seems to be difficult to ascertain. I'm curious if the Slashdot community has any information or experience regarding international cellular services offered in this country and the means of obtaining it."

Comment Re:But if that's right... (Score 1) 774

[snip]

The following is from a great book by A.K. Dewdney: Yes, We Have no Neutrons.

The formula is N = R* x Fp x Ne x Fl x Fi x Fc x L

For which:
R* = number of new stars that form in our galaxy each year
Fp = fraction of stars having planetary systems
Ne = average number of life-supporting planets per star
Fl = fraction of those planets on which life develops
Fi = fraction of life forms that become intelligent
Fc = fraction of intelligent beings that develop radio
L = average lifetime of a communicating society

The formula has appeared in several popular science magazines with the values set to:

N = 10 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 0.01 x 0.1 x L

So, N = 0.01 x L

The only numbers in the formula which anything other than a guess can be made are R* and L. Based on current observations most set R* at 10. Everything else in the formula would be a wild guess, except for L. More is known about L than any other part of the formula, since we are a communication society. Since we receive more and more of our communication from satellites, cable, and the internet, we are broadcasting less and less away from the earth. In the near future we will likely go dark as a significant source of radio/broadcast signals capable of being detected from space. If we say that our source of signals is about 100 years, drop the 100 back into the formula and you get 1. That must be us.

You have a slight units error in your analysis.

R* x Fp x Ne results in the number of new life supporting planets *per year*.

Multiplying the next three terms (Fl x Fi x Fc) gives us the fraction (or probablility) of those planets that will eventually have intelligent life.

So, to get the number of coexisting societies per galaxy, you can more or less take the number of new societies per year and multiply by the number of years during which those societies will be able to detect each other (L). The number of new detectable societies (with your wildly optimistic probabilities :) ) = 1.

That's not 1 technological society ever, that's an average of one in existence for any given year, in our galaxy.

There can be many many civilizations that rise and fall, and never know each other, over the course of billions of years.

Comment Re:Historical graphs [Re:any evidence] (Score 1) 2369

Spending has gone up with both parties in control of the presidency or the congress. The main difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats raise taxes when they spend more, but the Republicans don't. Here's a nice write-up on the national debt over the years:

http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm

Unfortunately, he doesn't provide inflation-adjusted graphs, which would be interesting.

This is one thing I find funny about "political sloganism" - the Republicans always talk about "tax and spend Democrats", but never talk about the fact that the republicans are the "don't tax but spend anyway" party. As an individual you can't spend money if you don't make money, and there's no reason for the government to be any different. (and many reasons for the government to be the same - read "The Creature From Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin for a lot of interesting information about how the financial system works)

Operating Systems

Submission + - Next Windows to Be Redesigned for Multicore CPUs

eldavojohn writes: "A Microsoft executive announced that the next Windows will be fundamentally redesigned to handle the numerous cores of present and future processors. The article notes that with Vista, the 20 year old GDI/GDI+ model was completely rewritten. Has Microsoft finally learned not to persist limitations and bad features of operating systems through generations? It will be interesting to see how Microsoft tackles the race conditions and deadlocks that come with pervasively multi threaded software and in the past complicated attempts to utilize multiple CPUs (like BeOS). Do you think it's it a smart move to further complicate an operating system to take advantage of these cores or should Microsoft concentrate on utilizing a single core for Windows while the applications take advantage of (possibly) more resources?"
GUI

Submission + - Multi-touch: the future of GUIs?

malbrech writes: "Multi-touch, the wonder piece of Apple's iPhone may have a much larger future. An article in fatscompany.com describes how the genious behind Multi-touch, Jeff Han, developed the technology for large screens and gives a glimpse into the amazing potential born by the touch paradigm. There is also a fantastic video showing the use of multi-touch in various applications. Yes, reminiscences of AI become alive."

Slashdot Top Deals

The following statement is not true. The previous statement is true.

Working...