Look, if these accusations are true, there's no problem with you posting where the civilians were outed.
Actually, you need to tell that to the news agencies -- including the New York Times, who initially broke the story. The reports from all sources that I have seen (and I looked up quite a few) have all been only that such information exists in the leaked documents, presumably scattered among the thousands of pages of information, and that the Taliban has been sifting through these in order to plan revenge attacks. Thus the "comprehensive list" that I referred to is one that the Taliban (and/or other enemies) are compiling, not some handy-dandy list to which someone can simply point.
That stated reason that the NYT and other news agencies are not even referencing a single name in particular or location in any document as to where this information can be found is to avoid placing said persons in jeopardy -- that is, more jeopardy than they are already in anyway. The NYT article -- and admittedly the NYT is not the most trusted, unbiased news source in the world, but assuming that their reporting is accurate -- put it this way: "The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, has said that the organization withheld 15,000 of the approximately 92,000 documents in the archive that was released on Sunday to remove the names of informants in what he called a “harm minimization” process. But the 75,000 documents WikiLeaks put online provide information about possible informants, like their villages and in some cases their fathers’ names."
Now, you can interpret all of these reports as simply propaganda designed to turn the public against Wikileaks. Or you can accept the reports that in those 75,000 documents, there is information that the enemy can use against both troops and civilians. Having not sifted through all 75,000 documents myself, but knowing the demeanor and past track record of Wikileaks, I tend to think that these reports are probably accurate and that these documents do contain information that could put both troops and civilian informants (and their families/villages) in danger.
That said, I wish we'd just get the hell out of there.