Right -

Because Assad is doing *so well* in syria with his air superiority over the rebels,
just as the afghanistan conflict is so terribly solved in favor of the US backed interests,
and Iraq was a 'piece of cake'.

And lets just conveniently not even mention vietnam, or any one of a huge number of
successful armed rebellions in latin america, or africa, etc. in the last 50 years.

No, actually, this is NEITHER a DOS Attack, nor a vulnerability. It is a *bug*

But oh so much better to douschebag promote yourself by being the super terducken 31337 hax0r sekuritah expert
by mislabeling it and having it get picked up by the tech press.

Yah dude, you're so totally spot on - noone at all documents this!

I think he was talking about how he is a clueless moron.

LVM has snapshots and DM has encryption.

And since when is deduplication a 'critical' enterprise feature?

e.g. who else has it other than ZFS in the unix world without having an expensive addon product etc?

(other than DragonFlyBSD's hammer, which unfortunately corporate weenies have testicles too small to deploy)

maybe critical for your application - but this doesn't mean its mega-lagging behind.

Which, without the over sensationalized BS that is this story, will probably be in about a week tops.

And since BTRFS is not in any 'enterprise' Linux Distributions, means that it will pretty much be available
immediately since everyone running it in critical production environments will probably be running
pretty bleeding edge linuxen

What do you mean by: 'the war between the states'

Aren't all wars between states?

Or is this some sort of veiled euphamism for the US Civil War, whereby a completely moronic rebellion which wouldn't have occurred if people didn't want to enslave others despite their alleged subscription to a constitution which gave 'inaliable rights to all', thankfully, was defeated by people who have 1/2 a brain, and the losers prattled on about their 'states rights' and other random garbage (all the while passing jim crow laws and creating nonsense like 'segragation'), and started referring to this war as 'the war between the states' in an apparent desire to make it seem like a minor disagreement between two completely valid viewpoints and also to make it sound like some stupid mint julip discussion on the veranda at the derby?

Make a coherent case that the civil war would have happened without slavery, and I'll agree with the 'confederate' opinions that it is about federalism vs centralism. Until then, call it 'The US Civil War' .

Nono - of course not!

Clearly because :

Obamas middle name is 'hussain' and not 'Honkey Mc Wasp Cracker'

The obama presedency is:

A half baked conspiricy theory that doesn't make any sense, whereby his dead islamic but free-market liberal (aka 'liberal' not 'librul') step father secretly controls his president stepson Barrack to implement Chinese-style free-market authoritarian 'communism' despite the fact that the Chinese government is hostile at worst and ambivalent at best to any form of organized religion.

This theory is justified, because some doof on fox news has made some sort of bolony equation that the islamic 'caliphate' expressed in the koran in the mid 600's is really a form of subverted marxist communism which was invented in the mid 1800s to early 1900s,
and also because donald trump manages to say through 10 layers of facelift, botox, and hair bleach, that in fact *barak obamas* legitimate birth certificate is a fake, instead of his entire visage.

So obviously:

Electing a wishy washy, opinion changing ex-outsourcer-to-china who believes in *mormonism* for crying out loud, would have enabled a sea change of US opinion and therefore the end of the chineese empire, enabled the so-called 'liberation' of
the 'secular' state of Israel from the evil Islamic tear-wrists, thereby proving american exceptionalism, and the recreation
of the third temple which would magically bring forth the tribulation and end times, and the fulfillment of Gods promise to the Jews
that they would be the chosen people but somehow would automatically convert to Christianity upon this event and thankfully since I am a WASP would be raptured up to heaven with my pre-1985 class III weapons and I wouldn't have to ever look at someone who has dark skin or speaks spanish ever again because the unclean 'darkies' were not predestined by Zwingli and John Weslayan, the apostles of the true made up faith, to have a place in the hereafter halleluja!

Testify my Brothers! It is the Truth!

Saying this is 'broken' (by saying it is 'fixed' now) because it doesn't let you mix windows is a total crap article title.

Slashdot is getting as bad as information week with the sensationalist crap titles

Hey there nazi boy - why don't you post as non-ac?

Don't want your blonde boyfriend to know you were slashdotting instead of cleaning his vibrator?

> That said, when we start censoring the internet, who do we put in charge, what safe guards do we have, and what prevents this from setting a terrible precedent.

Didn't you mean to say:

"censorship stands against freedom of speech which is a fundemental right and therefore we shouldnt even consider it, even in a regulated approach?"

> Think bigger, change that to every political extremist including Israels and I' m with that.

Why don't you save us all a bullet then and commit suicide?

Then why do you all keep moving there so much?

And what did the t-shirts say in gaza?

As for occupier:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests

etc.

Noone is 'right' here. Both need to advocate peace and tolerance.

and 'this ethnic group is racist' is itself racist.

but I guess thats' why you posted as AC

disclaimer: I'm not advocating being a proponent of one side or the other here - but just that you need to look at the entirety of the events