Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Play favorites? I believe it (Score 1) 323

While the parent already commented on this, I'll say this just for information sake. People in South Carolina call USC "Carolina", and people in North Carolina call UNC "Carolina". So when someone talks about "the Carolina game" it really matters what state they're from to know what they're talking about.

Comment Re:Is there any proof that fingerprints are unique (Score 1) 159

It's somewhere between extremely difficult and impossible to "prove" anything that isn't pure mathematics. You can estimate probabilities to within statistically significant bounds (it's 99.999% possible that you are the father of that child, etc.) Proof, as an abstraction, is much more difficult. To prove that DNA is unique, you would need to sequence every human who ever lived, is currently living, or will ever live. Disproof, by contrast, is much easier. You could disprove that DNA is unique with only 2 people (though it's very unlikely).

Comment Re:Google can do what they want, but it is a bad i (Score 1) 318

Real names make it easy to find people you know on a social network, and to remember the identities of people you connect with on them. Social networks are most valuable for "loose connections" like friends from grade school or non-immediate relatives. You might be interested in their lives, but can't commit the energy or mental capacity to identifying them in the first place or remembering the association function between their pseudonym and their identity.

You or others like you might not care about weak social ties, but (evidently) a vast majority of computer users do.

Comment Re:Yes (Score 3, Insightful) 318

It offers no value to users.

This is demonstrably false. You can say that pseudonymity has great value. You can say that to you, it has vastly more value than "real names". However, to say that real names offer to value to users, whose goal is to connect primarily with people they know in real life, is either ignorant or defiantly stupid.

Comment Re:Oh, look (Score 1) 384

That's exactly the point, though. They aren't trying to kill item or gold farming. They want to make it (relatively) safe for their players, who will buy items anyway. I would much rather players be able to pay through a Blizzard service than giving their credit card information to some level 1 Witch Doctor name itemsforgoldcom

Comment What alternative? (Score 2, Informative) 425

If someone can point me to competing service that is accepted at my preferred retailers, I would gladly switch. Paypal provides a relatively safe mask for my bank account online, which means I trust 1 company to not have a security breach instead of a dozen or more. It's a fantastic service. I don't honestly care about anyone's perceived unforgivable injustices from a private, opt-in, and largely free to use company.

Comment Re:The problem... (Score 1) 496

Please source this. I personally know a 30+ year gradeschool principle who makes 90k/year. Are you saying that teachers get payed 4.5k/year? Even 8X seems ridiculous. Teachers are paid at a minimum 45K in New York City and 35k in my suburban district. What public school administrators make $280,000 a year? In my state, the only state employees that make that much are University chairs and football coaches (which is stupid by itself).

Comment Re:This could be a very bad thing... (Score 1) 267

what's worse is that with the "circles" bs, google builds a profile of you that only google can see.

https://plus.google.com/settings/exportdata. If you don't have an account, that is where you can download your profile, contacts, circles, pictures, and stream content in open formats for use with any (or no) service.

Comment Re:This could be a very bad thing... (Score 1) 267

In reality, they are delivering content that will appeal to a maximum number of users. Very simply , more users want "real name" services than want anonymous services, so companies who want to maximize profits encourage real identity. While sad for users who enjoyed the privacy and anonymity of the old days, the fact that they are in the minority, coupled with Metcalfe's Law, means that their preferred online experience is by definition a niche market, and not worth pursuit by multi-billion dollar companies.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is better to never have tried anything than to have tried something and failed. - motto of jerks, weenies and losers everywhere

Working...