You outed my kind. I even have a DLT autochanger, but it sits disused in the shed. Point is, my data is not that important and there are multiple copies of the stuff that is important, in particular my CV, just because I keep switching computers or copying stuff to other machines in the course of normal activity.
Also there's nothing like massive data loss to reduce the time spent managing files.
It's a sequence of 01 repeating. The fact that it comes out as "U" is probably irrelevant.
There, fixed that for you.
Do you often spend time typing before you know what you're going to type?
Me, I think about what I'm going type, then I know what I'm going to type, then I type it. Efficiency in completing the typing allows me to get back to thinking.
I wouldn't give up a mouse (unless you're giving me a nipple to replace it), it's handy for many situations, but the less I have to use the mouse, the happier I become.
Happy workers are productive workers.
I hope you don't tell people that survival is all it's good for. I spend much of my working life in vi, and for making ad-hoc changes quickly there is little to match it. Add Firemacs to Firefox and not only does it give you Emacs keybindings, you get vi keybindings for free too! C-x k to close that window, h and j to switch tabs - it's dreamy. Pick the best tool for the job though, sometimes sed is the better tool, sometimes a perl script.
Firemacs rocks. Look: Firemacs!
s/Touch Point/Trackpoint/
And yes they rock. Every keyboard should have a nipple, so I may twiddle with it.
So you're saying that usage of the word Web will expand over time to include lots of other things that aren't really Web? And then the common useage of the word will become accepted? No shit Sherlock. It's not a new phenomenon, but it doesn't actually change anything, and people who understand the difference between Web (HTML/HTTP) and RTSP or FTP will continue to use them appropriately.
No, we're not going back to the dumb terminal days. It's to useful to be able to do stuff without some third party dictating if/when/how we can do it. Some stuff will move but it's going to be the same kind of non-revolution that Web 2.0 has been for normal people.
You're grasping at straws, like most people I don't have a file named rf in my root directory and if I did I'd rather it was rm'd.
I think not. So I don't get it. Why does greater mass than we thought, mean impact with another object sooner than we thought?
Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.
