For the non-Portuguese speaking people, this is an old joke in Brazil:

-Do you know Mario?
-What Mario?
-The one who fucked you behind the closet.

It rimes in Portuguese. =/

According to unreliable sources that I can't quote, it was due to a typo. Beats me what keyboard layout they were using.

Your comment did nothing to answer my question. And while my understanding of Japanese is poor at best, it's enough to know that you're wrong, either deliberately or due to incompetence.

I don't get it. How does "wowo" turn into "Luigi"?

I agree. Let's go lynch niggers together sometime.

Slashdotters love quoting Orwell whenever possible, regardless of context.

We should make sure that the entire human population has this "disorder" in no less than five generations.

3D can be immersive if done properly, but studios go for flash or for those annoying "something's going to hit you in the face" effects. The most immersive 3D experience I've had in the movies was Ice Age 3. Everything else (yes, including Avatar) was sub-par.

You could put it that way, I suppose.

I stated an honest opinion and got modded down as a troll. I call shenanigans.

I didn't claim that they changed. I said that they seem less like an evil empire every day. This is a comparative statement, and largely due to Google's recent privacy issues and (though I didn't mention it in the parent post) Apple's absurdly restrictive mobile platforms. It also happens to be the case that Redmond's PR office seems to be doing a better job at promoting specific ventures lately.

Disclaimer: All my computers run exclusively on Linux (Gentoo, Linux Mint and Crunchbang), my favorite search engine is Google and I own an iPod.

As far as I'm concerned everything should be cross-platform. So my reaction would probably be positive.

Of course I do! It's the only explanation there could be for me disagreeing with you, right?

They seem like less of an evil empire now that they're doing some good stuff once in a while and Google is being more blatantly monopolistic.

I agree with every word of your post, but precisely because of this it's obvious to me that there can be no other reason behind publishing this book full of outrageous (even if true - if there were available evidence it would be different) claims than the furthering of a very specific political agenda. I do think that's a very nice definition of FUD?