Comment Re:on-board intel? (Score 1) 403
Updates to the browser are provided in a
At least in Ubuntu you get Firefox updates automatically. Clearly easier than getting
Updates to the browser are provided in a
At least in Ubuntu you get Firefox updates automatically. Clearly easier than getting
So please tell me, how does one generically "install" an application on "Linux"?
It's silly to complain about Linux not being supported when Linux itself doesn't support the basic concept. It will probably be up to the distribution vendors like Ubuntu to customize this for their own desktop environment.
They're proposing this because the other "solution" they announced obviously totally sucks (but they have no choice).
To pretend this is only Opera's problem is silly. It's an everybody-who-is-not-Webkit problem. Which is why Mozilla said they will do the same, and if Microsoft ever gets any mobile devices out, they'll have the same problem.
...and some vendors (mostly Apple, a little bit Google) have an interest in that not happening. So good luck waiting.
Free software is here. We've won. The strict rules of the GPL aren't necessary because people are willing to create, use, and propagate free software without them.
Citation needed.
GPL3 focuses on anti-tivoization and patents. According to your reasoning, that's not needed because companies are voluntarily allowing their users to hack their devices, and they're not patenting software? You must live on another planet. Without an axe to wield like the GPL, free software is dead in 5 years. It's annoying so many people are just so incredibly naive, or corporate brainwashed, in this regard.
A sheep's way of saying "I don't like what you say".
Not really, your post was just incorrect bullshit. SFC doesn't start suing for software they don't own the licensing to, unless they are hired by the copyright holder.
If you don't care what your users do with your software, there's little point in using the GPL.
Only as far as resources permit.
Slashdot even covered that; http://games.slashdot.org/story/11/06/29/1824253/worlds-best-chess-engine-outlawed-and-disqualified
Looks like the editors have a short memory.
That's why it's so unnecessarily hard to change the default search
Click search box. Select alternate one. Done. That was hard
I don't understand why the editors even post such crap. The comments are supposed to be stupid here, not the articles themselves!
Do Not Track was a feature *introduced in Firefox and promoted by Mozilla*. Every browser ended up implementing it, and last of all Chrome did so grudgingly, mostly because Google didn't want to be the only one not to have it. Whether it's effective or not I'll leave up to debate - I prefer to use Ghostery myself and not rely on sites to cooperate. Call me cynical.
The second paragraph of the article is entirely a troll: the "have-you-stopped-beating-your-wife type questions that has no good answer" turns out to *have* an answer, it just didn't fit the viewpoint of the poster, who doesn't want to acknowledge that.
The original article seems to be totally ignorant of the fact that Do Not Track *was introduced by Mozilla*.
Google was *the last one* to add it, because they hate it, of course. So no, Mozilla doesn't give a shit what Google thinks.
Also, Chrome is *not* open-source. Chromium is.
Chrome/Berkelium doesn't allow you to make a fully usable GUI, let alone look native. It was never meant for GUI toolkit work.
XUL/Gecko do - it was a designed as a GUI toolkit from the beginning, and it's what powers Firefox and Thunderbird.
If a thing's worth doing, it is worth doing badly. -- G.K. Chesterton