Zangief takes his name from a real-life Russian wrestler, Victor Zangiev. More interesting to me is that the working name for this character was Vodka Gobalsky. This is notable for two reasons for one, that this name is amazing [and] deserves to enter into the public consciousness and, for another, that it bears a striking resemblance to the name of a Russian boxer in Nintendo's Punch-Out!! series, Vodka Drunkenski.

Who gave me the idea that his name was Soda Popinski? I hope I didn't own the Special Edition of Mike Tyson's Punchout! Can anyone confirm this?

Wow so Mod's are issuing points to anyone who makes declarations without evidence?

Before you knock somthing, try using it for once. Application programmers shouldn't mock ALSA as it is tied directly to the Linux platform for flexibility. Let libSDL handle all the proprietary shit so you can play CATMEOW.wav whenever your application sucks a nut; you don't need to lock a sound adapter in /dev directory anymore like you did before in 4Front OSS. You can have more than one application use sound now thanks to ALSA, out of the box without ESD or YIFF and friends. Ever try directing development of a code-base that was not in your control? That's another reason why ALSA is here. Typical explanations from me, just look at all the support ALSA brings and it is all modules; you don't need INSMOD every module because the tier determines how many accesspoints to play your widget-noise.

- Ballmer sounds like an unpatriotic ass. Perhaps /I'm wrong and he's a really nice guy, but not in this article. He's turning his back on the country that gave Ballmer opportunity to be where he is today. Industrialist Carnegie came from Scotland and loved the U.S., and maintained loyalty until his death. He would have never entertained the idea of moving factories to China for cheap labor.

And if the people each were in equal share with one-another to hold shares in Microsoft Corporation, they would favor to move Microsoft Corporation overseas as to prevent a corporation called U.S. Government from soliciting to their equitable relationship.

- Raising corporat taxes doesn't affect the consumer as badly as you believe. Yes some prices get raised, but increased taxation also leads to more cuts internally like plastic desks instead of mahogany, fewer free trips to Vegas, snd so on.

- If California's standard of living drops, then wages will drop, and eventually the factories will move back here because WE will be the cheaper labor than the Chinese.

California doesn't have a low standard of living; the country is tiered by capacity. The purpose of taxation is to impede unlawful activity. The purpose of a corporation is to allow limited liability to whomever develops a product that may not perform to the expectations of whomever might buy it; I would reason that the more corporations exist is reason to believe that there is an educational dysfunction or perhaps a myth that impedes a purchase of property marketed. Microsoft Corporation has been moving in that myth for quite a while, because none seem to be satisified and it has been appeasing all kinds of privatized assertions of foreign agents that aren't even interested in its property. If an idea known as We the People had each an equal share in Microsoft Corporation, would we want it moved overseas just so it wouldn't be taxed by the same principles? Bi-polar country? Whomever owns Microsoft Corporation has the right to move its foundation wherever it is needed?

I'm still somewhat unsatisfied how allegedly one can remove his or her sovereignty by entering an equitable relationship with another (Clearfield Doctrine). Isn't Law neutral to a dispute in equity?

I asked her the last time she flew Virgin Atlantic and by that *wink* how fast was an unladen European swallow. Her answer: I charge US 400 per hour, not counting the initial cost to travel wherever you want me.

And I went a walk further, the more merry by knowing that God gives such for free...
Thanks I'll be here all week.

without prejudice,
m. Gregory Thomas(tm).

Question sits on;
  who called a "COP" to be neutral to mediate a dispute?
  why a "COP" is taking someone against their will to another place (not locale)?
  why a "COP" asserts their 2nd-amendment rights while depriving whomever he accused as the first, and yet is expected to be neutral while standing as a complainant to conclude you become defendent roadside rather than "accused"?
  why a "COP" has an interest in the outcome of a dispute in the form of bonuses to wages or immediate demotion and promotion?
  why a "COP" asserts only preservation of disputes to the perview necessary of his office and disregards the greater complexities that ultimately are preponderance supreme and lawful over nuisance intermediary interventions of non-interested parties and untrusted intervenors?

It is to my comprehension that a "COP", the word derived from the "cuff" but with a slant more to its origin as a federal fraternal order, is nothing more than bias from someone who has no right to be offended by another's lawful standing in a non-legal pursuit; diversity of citizenship. Ask yourself, who would dare make a call or summon to have insurect a random unknown to appear and what kind of corporation would specialize in sending their employees by unwritten to immaturely measure the necessity of the dispute to determine whether it warrants coercing one or the other to sign a contract to appear in a re-enacted "scene" of the phil-"ocipher"'s deciding worthy of preservation and defend such in same manner to the subject of a military-lunatic ecclesiatical rank that was created by God more equal than you? Defend what evidence that we preserved for you, knave/infantry/child?

Such is an inferior court constructed by contract, timless, not of record, and to the core a criminal operation that derives its criminal authority from you becoming a criminal by signing the title of the thing in dispute (perhaps your name) in their cellbox on their negotiable instrument. That "COP" that arrived to mediate between you, well he was actually an "Judicial Council" despite him being with prejudicee, which proves why I endorse all my Contracts that presuppose me to commit or perform an unlawful act upon my signing it: "without prejudice" or "with protest" as would an officer speaking to another officer in competition of stupidity, not of interest or absolute righ, but duty to the Reconstruction Acts that continue to this day.

without prejudice,
m. Gregory Thomas(tm).

Greet's in the name of Network Redundancy.

I'm not got to say this particulary to you, but to everyone; Abraham Lincoln was a liar and a thief most of his life. If he intended to free the slaves then the only thing to do was measure the value and discharge or buy them their supposed freedom in a procedure untitled as "manumit", because to "transfer title of ownership" is known titular as Emancipate. Most of the alleged slaves were stolen, and the people at the time were most likely murderous cowards that wouldn't confront the unlawful trade of lawful money for unlawful purposes. I suppose people back then would think twice in unlawfully buying an honest slave from a perverted slavemaster, only to laps on the productivity of being repayed by the new servant because of some dispute or inheritance of kin carrying further into the future; such is the cloak of missionary and church work, but it still stands as unlawful. Going backwards on this paragraph: The difference between Emancipate and Manumit is night and day: Abraham Lincoln stole/transfered title of ownership of that personal property (chattel) to a corporation called "United States" in the district of Columbia; he created a corporation called "United States" among the United States. Don't call me insane; look into the articles of association of whether there in-fact is a (singular/not-plural) "United States" that is capable of holding property and making claims and suing and being sued by someone that its agents have decided to injure or tort or damage/exchange.

While a country is at war, it's normal form of trade in domestic or non-domestic (not business, not "business or trade" representations in code) is always suspended to an approval-mode of privilege. Military without civil authority can tend to be an authority of itself. This has been enhanced later by The Trading With The Enemy Act which has tried to put the Treasury agents in a position of trust on whether someone should conduct currency with another. This was achieved recently using A Direct Treasury Account, yet in the majority of US'ians it is overlooked or inactive because of the plausible deniability; as codified in Internal Revenue Code, only a corporation can be taxed on income; he presumption in a matter of taxation is every sole singular/Name in registeration will be a corporate sole as defined; not the legislature's limited liability registration First Name principle Last Name application form, but Name itself. A corporation doesn't have a First Name or a Last Name, but by diversity of citizenship clauses is a corporation acknowledged in the First Judiciary Act and later immortalized through the privilege of private citizenship in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Abraham Lincoln only did one thing good, evidencing that he was turning himself around in a better light, and that was to have Congress regulate trade through non-interest bearing currency directly to the United States Mint. Many documentaries are on this subject, but it still stands; he's not another nail in the coffin for the de jure united States; he bought the coffin, perhaps bought it from himself after making it from all those mental logs he had allegedly split.

I'm a man unlike Obama (Kenyan), and I don't approve this mess.

without prejudice,
  m. Gregory Thomas(tm).

I wrote israel, not Israel.
I'm related to him by blood. I know these things. And to let you know, he was corrupt.
He created a corporation called "United States" to incorporate the district of Columbia; in other words, a United States to incorporate the United States.

Hand in your summoning card; where is the light in an undead principal that doesn't stand on its own?

without prejudice,
m. Gregory Thomas(tm).

Thanks for bumping heads with me. I am verry interested in especially your observation and evidence. What I find odd is how you mis-represent the cause of a Virus to spread through one's cell bodies as incorporated to new functions (metabolic changes, division changes). As well, what other symptoms is she to present to an examiner other than that she has painful fibers of mis-colored thread coming out of her skin and are you saying to me and others reading that there is a premeditated disposition to treat any such evidence as being from a "crazy" subject? Psychology has no basis on the body, nowhere does she have mental psoriasys that you suggest. Perhaps you can point me to the books that you have read other than the typical psychologist default of "hallucination" or "delusion", where in law what you realy intend is a mis-representation of fact no less than incomplete comprehension of the matter; not some Dungeons'n'Dragons hallucination of a spell-caster that you elude to every behest that correlates from a non-injured spectator as yourself.

I'm going to overlook the presentation of how you responded and look just at the facts. I met her, not you; You just saw a YouTube video of a sickly lady. What she and many others are suffering from is moreso a diminished immune system if anything. What you overlook in the quackery department is the origin of its foundations being misapplied at random to perhaps unrelated diseases caused from perhaps undisclosed lifestyle difficulties. I'll tread lightly on your behalf and reason to your favor; Not judging you in any way, I believe we both know the dopamine receptor of the mind to be assured through a positive conjecture that even if it is a "placebo" then that would still be an effect of the mind: what is the body responding to, not the mind? Colloidal (ionic) silver was originally an absolute remedy for hereditary arthritis and a fix for arthritis caused by certain virus that actually deposit calcium in the joints. Sure, she can only endorse a certain product because it's likely her return service in essence of it being effectual. If NutriSilver was recommended to her and even a "placebo" as I believed you to justifiedly say, then that is for her to reason its effects. Again I ask, what is the body doing? If there ever was a conflict of interest then it would be nothing more than that of an inexpensive oil change, and not a weekly grocery bill or even higher-cost a pharmaceutical prescription without end; ionic silver generated and assimilated by one's self is not costly.

I don't "take sides" on any issue, but when someone starts accusing someone of hallucinating to a remedy or allegedly delusional without any reservation referenced to an authority of Wundt or Freud, and yet whomever standing as accused has no spirit of violence and with circumstances that are not out of their hand to fix whatever damages they may have caused or never caused that would inhibit their estate, then I must respectively disagree with your methods as I find them to be delusional and hallucinatory.

If it isn't hurting you, don't insult the mentally ill; mental illness isn't contagous as we both know, however if it were a bodily illness then you should still have nothing to fear because from what you said prior that the body and mind are one and the same illusion of the nervous systems' conception.

I guess it's somthing you have to see for yourself to verified accounts, not the side of quackery you may attest to have met that I would agree may be the consultancy of a Folie'a'Deux aspect of schizzofrenia working its way through to Morgellon's Disease sysmptoms. I find that quite revealing.

My pen is fading, so I hope I don't sound too abrash towards you. I'm a more calming effect talking in person than what tends to be met here as though a mis-mannered viking hacking at every thought, and I do appreciate your oberservations over the contrite people suffering from what is alleged mere hallucinations and delusions; perhaps psoriasis or acne, some bugged-out eyes, loss of hair, weak joints, digestive problems, fatigue, and a pale gaze. Those are symptoms of the endocrine system more likely. I know Abbot Laboratories is selling a Meal Replacement Nutrition Supplement(R), titled ENSURE(tm), chock full of the L-DOPA enhancing dihydroxyl phenylalanine that would masque many of those properties to whomever doesn't have an immune system to react to it, but that is not addressing the root cause. Most people that attest to some degree of Morgellon's Disease all find the same remedy: better quality and organic food, get away from the industrialization centers of populated cities, get lots of exercise to counter hypoxia of any degree. That's not insane, that's just a lifestyle change; you know what happens when you eat an imbalanced diet; it hits you later on in life.

m. Gregory Thomas(tm)

Greetings in the nature of network redundancy!

You are confusing a delusion with a misrepresentation of fact. They are both mutually exclusive at most. I met once (and from thorough discussion would admit) a lady over in Orange city of California that has Morgellon's Disease. She even has video on YouTube. She is not delusional and has accepted that her health difficulties are just an autoimmune response to her cells having incorporated new functions directly from environmental influences not in her comfort or favor. All that she has done to circumvent these unwanted side-effects is to (1) eat better quality of food, (2) greater amounts of exercise, (3) do not patronize companies whose products are found to cause the unwanted effects, and (4) advocate the greater theory that regional emplements of service by companies should be avoided so as to not effect the non-subscribers of their work. It generally is a question of to not give the benefit of a country to neighboring countries; such as changes of weather, water quality, medical support, guards of patrol, pest-control, court-dispute housing, food, and drugs; these should be implemented on a per-houshold basis at the writ of whomever subscribed, not the far-reaching all-implicit exercise of service that is detrimental to the tax-payers that didn't pay for said civil function; this exhausts supply and is unethical from the well-intended regulation of the governing body to properly dispense these services.

M. Gregory Thomas(tm),
Network Redundancy administrator.

When that way has like 51 lanes of traffic and every other lane is going in the same direction? I'll have better luck on Jacob's ladder; like a fat man screeching down with two guys in parallel crawling up and having to swing out of the way from his $fat ass.

How can a wicked good observation be any less covert than double construction to manifest itself by decay of prudence? What is said and understood today could be more influential and different idea another time to come. Consider how "person", "adult", "nice", "human" and "statute" were profanities and abominable back in the days when language was accurate and unmingled with neighboring nations, yet now it is the subtle in law as the entrance to regulation and undisputed of its prior standing but for implied regulation.