Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment False, USSG said Stop buying Healthcare masks (Score 1) 247

... our US Surgeon General stated that masks are ineffective against the spread of COVID-19 back in late February. Look at up!

False. Surgeon General said stop BUYING masks (original tweet) https://mobile.twitter.com/Sur...

And the context was 100% clearly in relation to hording & supply problems for the US healthcare system. USSG said 1) stop hording, 2) stay home, 3) wash hands, 4) get a damn flu shot. You're a dupe, if you think otherwise.

Comment Re:WHO is administering Hydroxychloroquine (Score 1) 548

But there's a difference between testing something and saying "Someone I know took it and got better, so it clearly works!".

Right. What I am baffled by, is that folks post 300+ comments quibbling over how much this one drug is/not effective, yet not one poster thinks to point out that 90 national health systems are still currently trialing this very week (and that none of the four drug approaches are yet clearly worth using vs. any other):

"The WHO globally coordinated trial is an unprecedented effort to collect reliable data and compare the safety and effectiveness of four treatment protocols using different combinations of Remdesivir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Interferon beta, Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine." - WHO.int "Solidarity" trial

Comment WHO is administering Hydroxychloroquine (Score 1) 548

So clearly none of you realize the closest high-quality hoapital to you is probably administering Hydroxychloroquine to patients & reporting outcome to WHO, right now. https://www.who.int/malaysia/n...

The patient gives consent to study, hospital tells WHO which of 4x drugs they have on hand, then WHO instructs which one to give patient. It's not perfect, it's NOT double-blind, but the whole world is trying this week to collect SOME data & trying to save lives while you all argue without researching.

Comment SOURCES, shitposter (Score 2) 82

... ELEVEN dominant strains (and many sub-dominant strains, and over 1000 trivial strains) of SARS-CoV2 ... some of those proteins that have mutated are on the glycoprotein "spike" that is used to bind to and enter a human cell ... you may have immunity to one, but not the other 4 modified glycoprotein strains that are in circulation. This is why so many patients who "recover" get re-infected. ...

Link the source(s) on those quantities if you're not just posting shit.

I'm aware of NO credible research with evidence of even a single SARS-CoV-2 mutation that means anything beyond usefulness for epidemiological tracing. Closest I've heard to cross-strain protection is Covid-19 recovery might not protect against SARS "Classic", but SARS recovery *may provide partial* protection from SARS-CoV-2 for at least two years. https://www.nature.com/article...

So where does your specific "modified glycoprotein strains" re-infection info come from? These are still *very* early days yet, for detailed reliable data to be available; but garbage rumors are fast & easy to type up.

Comment Yes, primary Android browser for 3months now (Score 1) 589

Yes on systems I don't use that much and No on my primary system.

Similar mix of yes/no, but my yes *is* a primary system.

Firefox Nightly is my daily-driver browser on Android with 57.0a1 as my primary mobile browser for nearly 3 months now (I'm now on 58.0a1). FF Nightly seems to be the only way to get a feature-rich open browser with automatic updates if your device does not have Google Play app installed.

Nightly and 57/58 is definitely an upgrade over the previous mobile Firefox. Works great with uBlock Origin & Video Background Play Fix add-ons, which is about everything needed on mobile. As for no - I've not bothered to update Firefox on any workstation I use, home or office (or at least haven't noticed or cared what version is running). Chrome or Chromium is primary on all workstation, except for one daily Debian system with a little-used Firefox browser.

Comment Not Poisonous - read your own post (Score 1) 138

... must use the following more dangerous pesticides.

Here are some pesticides used in organic agriculture, with their median lethal doses:

Did you not read your own post? Those substances are demonstrably not dangerous to people.

median lethal dose of 4,500mg/kg? So essentially not toxic. Down at 370mg/kg is where noticeable effects even start: So if you weigh only 90lb and eat an apple smothered with half an ounce of Pyrethrum you still have a 50% chance of surviving. There is a lot of shit, which if you ate a half ounce smothered onto a 3 to 3.5oz apple would kill you.

math isn't even needed, to see how wrong this part of your post was

Azadirachtin is a wide spectrum very potent insecticide. Almost non toxic to mammals

for consideration dicamba, the inorganic pesticide is 757mg/kg LD50 in rats

At the point I assume any further nuance, like comparatively greater importance of acute toxicity vs lethal dose for the case of pesticide consumption, is just beyond you

Comment broadcast... complete lack of context (Score 2) 152

... they "Falsified data" on strength and durability of aluminum and copper... what does this mean in real terms?. Did they just check the "A-OK" box and fill in fake data without bothering to run the tests? Did they run the tests and then knowingly alter results? What is the difference between what they reported and actual conditions of materials sold? What is the risk? I would be most interested in any references that address these basic questions.

Agreed. All that the outlets I've read have let slip was: 1) there was a whisleblower, that got ignored, 2) all the numbers we've heard: 4% of aluminum sheets & rods, 200 buyers of iron powder, ongoing for up to 10 years, etc.

But what was the whisleblower's observation? Is reporting on that kind of detail just beyond the capacities of English language outlets?

My only guess is products which failed internal testing were by some process packed with good product/labeled as passing, the whisleblower had access to those internal tests but probably company's unclear on who misbehaved. Without internal failed test records, how else would they know "it was 4% of sales"?

Comment suprisingly? Google's been doing this for 9 years (Score 1) 42

Who the fuck would be surprised

Apparently anyone who does not remember "2008", when Google cars first started routinely collecting 3D laser range and imaging via SICK laser scanners.
http://www.educatingsilicon.co...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ("Close look at Google Street View car with Laser scanners and multiple cameras")

Comment Doesn't make the game more fun (Score 1) 61

Which is why players will go to a VR parlor and pay for this experience. It's the greatest game that nobody can *OWN*, but they can probably afford to play it.

And to make matters worse, there's already a Non-VR Bridge Simulator that is more fun &, less expensive http://store.steampowered.com/...

... that already has 3rd parties touring USA offering expensive, parlor-style setups. http://www.gamingnomads.com/

(Not affiliated with creator, or gaming nomads. Just played once at a convention, once at home; and both times made me smile.)

Comment Electric is Short-haul & it does it already (Score 1) 273

http://www.wrightspeed.com/tec...

Tesla co-founder. Perhaps they are working together? ...

frequent-stop drive cycles

[Emphasis mine] - this is not a replacement for the hundred million trucks we see hauling goods world-wide.

Electric (and LNG, etc.) is already a proven applications for urban, stop & go style, short-haul trucking. (Not that Phase2: More Customers, is a bad thing...)

Comment Weasel words, Theyve always sold Aggregate (Score 2) 125

just rent out your super cookie info.

Oh sure, they've never sold "individual" customer data, but Verizon & others continue to sell *aggregate* info: you know, because there's not an entire discipline focused on deanonymizing datasets.

At least now Verizon has paid a fine & agreed to make sure that they, first, *dupe* their customers into agreeing to Supercookie injection & tracking.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ve...

Comment no way to do low level customization (Score 1) 319

3. ... In their place will be a WebExtensions API which is only marginally more powerful than what Chrome can do. Many existing addons will never work under the restrictions that system places because WebExtensions offers no way to do low level customization. Several developers of prominent addons have already announced that they will stop development as a result.

Discouraging developers is unfortunate. But Mozilla does not win by freezing old code in place/ensuring 15 years of old tweaks apply to current browser model. What's an old-guard dev to do? They can't move to Chrome.. as you stated it has even less capability.

Fortunately, FF is open source so another browser can resurrect whatever capabilities Mozilla discards. Honestly I think they should shrink dramatically smaller than 9050 employees, light additional fires to further develop & modularize their core technologies. I do use Chromium mostly on the desktop but mobile-Firefox is my go-to, everyday, browser of choice on Android. It is capable, and i'm honestly more curious to see what benefits come from changing APIs then I care what happens to obscure addons like "OmniSidebar".

Slashdot Top Deals

"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Working...